Austin English wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:41 AM, James Mckenzie
> wrote:
>
>>> From: Austin English
>>> Sent: Nov 19, 2009 10:31 AM
>>> To: James Mckenzie
>>> Cc: Wine Development Mailing List
>>> Subject: Re: Difficulties with Regression Testing
>>>
>>>
>
2. Somethin
> http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/vg-crypt32_cert.txt
> shows a new UMR (purify-speak for uninitialized memory read) error
Patch sent:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-November/081698.html
--Juan
2009/11/21 Austin Lund :
> 2009/11/21 Paul Vriens :
>
>> if (abs(date2 - date1) == 1)
>> skip("We dont't check access times on a FAT filesystem\n");
>
>
>> "The date is always within 1 day (plus or minus)."
>
> It isn't quite that easy as the date field is a bitpacked struct
> holding the year, m
Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Eikum wrote:
---
dlls/mshtml/htmldoc3.c | 58
+++---
dlls/mshtml/nsiface.idl | 33 ++
dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.c | 29 ++-
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deleti
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Eikum wrote:
---
dlls/mshtml/htmldoc3.c | 58
+++---
dlls/mshtml/nsiface.idl | 33 ++
dlls/mshtml/tests/dom.c | 29 ++-
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[
objec
2009/11/21 Paul Vriens :
> if (abs(date2 - date1) == 1)
> skip("We dont't check access times on a FAT filesystem\n");
> "The date is always within 1 day (plus or minus)."
It isn't quite that easy as the date field is a bitpacked struct
holding the year, month and day. So you have to account
Been happening for a few days...not sure what triggered it, but when
coming back from work I see my login screen, which explains the lack
of 64-bit tests/appinstall results. I don't know if any of the D3D
guys could take a look, but I'd appreciate it...
--
-Austin
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Sir Gallantmon
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >> > What do you think about implementing wineserver kernel module or
> >> > handling only performance critical items in kernel?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Sir Gallantmon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> > What do you think about implementing wineserver kernel module or
>> > handling only performance critical items in kernel?
>>
>> There has long been talk of doing that. Linus is
>> eve
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> 임은지 wrote:
>
> > What do you think about implementing wineserver kernel module or handling
> only performance critical items in kernel?
>
> There has long been talk of doing that. Linus is
> even willing to take patches to implement win32 APIs
임은지 wrote:
> Is there anyone who uses Wine for server applications (game server, web
> server, etc.)?
It's been done. See e.g.
http://www.fpsadmin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16481
for how one fellow ran a game server in wine.
> Performance is very important issue for such applications. A server
Dan Kegel wrote:
http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/diff-comctl32_tab.txt
http://kegel.com/wine/valgrind/logs/2009-11-18-21.51/vg-comctl32_tab.txt
show a more inscrutable error:
Invalid write of size 4
at TAB_SetCurSel (tab.c:255)
by TAB_WindowProc (tab.c:3367)
by
On 11/20/2009 04:25 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed
Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the
contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for
Paul Chitescu wrote:
> On Monday 16 November 2009 04:11:25 pm Paul Chitescu wrote:
>> Changelog:
>> Add .cvsignore entries for .fake files.
>
> What's wrong with this? Applies cleanly to my pristine wine-CVS, tried with
> patch taken from wine-patches bounce.
>
> Whoever rejected with "fail
On 11/20/2009 04:40 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 11/20/2009 04:21 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
+ if(1 || compare_emf_bits(hMetafile, EMF_BITBLT, sizeof(EMF_BITBLT),
+ "emf_BitBlt", FALSE) != 0)
Shouldn't you get rid of that '1 ||' ?
Just saw you did that in the last one.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On 11/20/2009 04:21 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
+if(1 || compare_emf_bits(hMetafile, EMF_BITBLT, sizeof(EMF_BITBLT),
+"emf_BitBlt", FALSE) != 0)
Shouldn't you get rid of that '1 ||' ?
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Monday 16 November 2009 04:11:25 pm Paul Chitescu wrote:
> Changelog:
> Add .cvsignore entries for .fake files.
What's wrong with this? Applies cleanly to my pristine wine-CVS, tried with
patch taken from wine-patches bounce.
Whoever rejected with "fails to apply" please reply with the
Paul Vriens wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed
>> Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the
>> contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763
>>
On 11/19/2009 10:45 PM, Austin Lund wrote:
2009/11/19 Paul Vriens:
On 11/19/2009 01:23 PM, Austin Lund wrote:
-ok (pFileStructA->uFileDate == pFileStructW->uDate2&&
-pFileStructA->uFileTime == pFileStructW->uTime2,
-"Last write time shoul
Hi,
I've observed 2 seemingly opposed behaviours when no audio
driver is selected in winecfg's audio tab (or when winecfg's
audio tab had never been opened before in this .wine prefix):
- On one hand, some tests and apps still manage to produce sound.
- On the other hand (OTOH), some apps cease t
Is there anyone who uses Wine for server applications (game server, web server,
etc.)?
Performance is very important issue for such applications. A server should
serve a large number of clients at reasonable speeds.
What do you think about implementing wineserver kernel module or handling
On 11/19/2009 11:17 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Hi,
This is a new version of my test for bug 4543. This time, I followed
Dmitry's suggestion of using the existing functions for comparing the
contents of EMFs. I can't build tests for Windows both due to bug 20763
and due to the fact that I don't hav
22 matches
Mail list logo
