On 04/19/2010 11:44 PM, Stefan Leichter wrote:
---
include/wine/test.h |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Hi Stefan,
What's the idea/thought behind this (or what problem are you trying to
solve)?
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On 04/19/2010 08:22 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
NT4 and lower don't run these tests so maybe it should be "shell32 5.0
and lower" instead of "Windows 2000".
This one was reported by the testbot to wine-devel btw.
Changelog
Fix a test failure on Windows 2000
Please ignore this one. Nikolay wi
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Edward Savage wrote:
>
> Sounds like a good plan. I've been working on a personal schedule of
> one story per week excluding weeks where I've had a lot of work to do.
> So far over the last month since I started that's ended up with two
> stories, one of which i
On 04/10/2010 03:01 AM, Austin English wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Austin English wrote:
Anyone opposed to removing that keyword?
+1 on removing it.
It would be nice to have a bugzilla filter to replace it, too.
Are we keeping "tasklist
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:50:58PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> 2010/4/19 Marcus Meissner :
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Win32 ABI has its stack arguments aligned at 4 (2^2) bytes.
> > For MMX/SSE operations we however need to have the stack aligned
> > to 16 (2^4).
> >
> > So specify t
2010/4/19 André Hentschel :
> Internet Explorer 9 Preview needs it.
> ---
> programs/winecfg/appdefaults.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/programs/winecfg/appdefaults.c b/programs/winecfg/appdefaults.c
> index 8d28b0a..cf07fe8 100644
> --- a/programs
Tony Wasserka a écrit :
+static inline void check_ref(IUnknown *obj, int exp)
+static inline void check_release(IUnknown *obj, int exp)
We shouldn't use these function definitions anymore IMO, either do the ref
check in the code itself, or replace the check_ref and check_release functions
is_pow2 was in util.c, then remove. That's why I put then in texture.c.
But that's better to put them in util.c
just in case there are used from another part.
BTW, is your name Paulo, Jéremie or David ? ;-)
paulo lesgaz a écrit :
Maybe this function should be in util.c.
A+
David
--- En dat
Ben Klein a écrit :
On 19 April 2010 19:43, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 19 April 2010 09:43, Christian Costa wrote:
+BOOL is_pow2(UINT num)
+{
+UINT i;
+
+if (!num) return FALSE;
+for (i = 0; num >> 1; i++) num >>= 1;
+
+return (num << i) == num;
+}
This should at
Am 19.04.2010 um 17:50 schrieb Austin English:
> Have you complained to your ISP? The ones in this area have a webpage
> that allows you to disable it.
Indeed, there was a way. Well hidden, in the FAQ(Small gray-on-white font size
8 link at the bottom), in one of the many junk questions. But it s
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
On 19 April 2010 09:43, Christian Costa wrote:
+BOOL is_pow2(UINT num)
+{
+UINT i;
+
+if (!num) return FALSE;
+for (i = 0; num >> 1; i++) num >>= 1;
+
+return (num << i) == num;
+}
This should at least be static. You can also just replace it with
Paul Chitescu writes:
> This patch is somehow b0rked in CVS. regexp.c and tests/regexp.js were
> commited and then reverted.
>
> Is it possible to have them synched back to git?
I've disabled the updates for now, until I can find the time to look
into what happened here.
--
Alexandre Julliard
Hi,
while reading the german heise news i came across an article about wine.
Luckily there is an english version too:
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Wine-update-improves-Direct3D-and-64-bit-support-980599.html
german version:
http://www.heise.de/open/meldung/Wine-mit-verbesserter-3D-u
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
> Am 18.04.2010 um 20:42 schrieb Roderick Colenbrander:
>> Implementation details aside it would be very useful if a mechanism
>> can take advantage of GPU monitor APIs like the ones from nvidia
>> perfkit and GL_AMD_performance_monitor. Th
On Thursday 15 April 2010 07:37:36 pm Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Module: wine
> Branch: master
> Commit: 6f17fa5298449114a8532778b8a6c0f8a5c505de
> URL:
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=6f17fa5298449114a8532778b8a6c0f8a5c505de
>
> Author: Jacek Caban
> Date: Thu Apr 15 12:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> Am 18.04.2010 um 22:15 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
>>> Does
>>>
>>> notexist.example.com work?
>> $ ping notexist.example.com
>> ping: unknown host notexist.example.com
>>
>> Looks good. And beyond that, anything t
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
> I plan on releasing one WWN per Wine release which
> at a minimum will include a very short news section and the
> bugzilla/appdb stats. I will also be "crown sourcing" news via the
> Wine Wiki: http://wiki.winehq.org/Rece
Hey folks.
I plan on releasing one WWN per Wine release which
at a minimum will include a very short news section and the
bugzilla/appdb stats. I will also be "crown sourcing" news via the
Wine Wiki: http://wiki.winehq.org/RecentNewsQueue. If you would like
to get a news article into the WWN ple
Maarten Lankhorst writes:
> @@ -50,16 +33,14 @@
>
> WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(mmtime);
>
> -typedef struct tagWINE_TIMERENTRY {
> -struct list entry;
> -UINTwDelay;
> -UINTwResol;
> -LPTIMECALLBACK
Detlef Riekenberg writes:
> @@ -120,6 +120,89 @@ typedef struct tagSHLWAPI_THREAD_INFO
>IUnknown *refIE; /* Reference to the IE process */
> } SHLWAPI_THREAD_INFO, *LPSHLWAPI_THREAD_INFO;
>
> +typedef struct
> +{
> + void* lpVtbl;
> + LONG *ref;
> +} threadref;
You
> +static inline void check_ref(IUnknown *obj, int exp)
> +static inline void check_release(IUnknown *obj, int exp)
We shouldn't use these function definitions anymore IMO, either do the ref
check in the code itself, or replace the check_ref and check_release functions
with macros; the reason is
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1590
Your paranoid android.
Hi Marcus,
2010/4/19 Marcus Meissner :
> Hi,
>
> The Win32 ABI has its stack arguments aligned at 4 (2^2) bytes.
> For MMX/SSE operations we however need to have the stack aligned
> to 16 (2^4).
>
> So specify this explicitly.
>
> (This should probably be even part of attribute((stdcall)) perhaps
Marcus Meissner writes:
> This is not going to fly, as I very much doubt we will be able to
> convince them.
>
> Do we have examples of Linux code that doesn't do it?
>
> They have their call chain adjusted to have 16 byte alignment and only
> ensure this for main() and so suggest to the develope
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am 18.04.2010 um 22:15 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
>> Does
>>
>> notexist.example.com work?
> $ ping notexist.example.com
> ping: unknown host notexist.example.com
>
> Looks good. And beyond that, anything that doesn't start with www behaves
> properly too:
>
> $ ping www
Am 18.04.2010 um 20:42 schrieb Roderick Colenbrander:
> Implementation details aside it would be very useful if a mechanism
> can take advantage of GPU monitor APIs like the ones from nvidia
> perfkit and GL_AMD_performance_monitor. This would also allow us to
> monitor what is holding up the GPU.
Hi,
patch from Tony Wasserka.
A+
David
0001-Add-a-stubbed-D3DXDeclaratorFromFVF.patch
Description: Binary data
Am 18.04.2010 um 22:15 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
> Does
>
> notexist.example.com work?
$ ping notexist.example.com
ping: unknown host notexist.example.com
Looks good. And beyond that, anything that doesn't start with www behaves
properly too:
$ ping www.srevaewedoc.com
PING www.srevaewedoc.co
Maybe this function should be in util.c.
A+
David
--- En date de : Lun 19.4.10, Henri Verbeet a écrit :
De: Henri Verbeet
Objet: Re: [PATCH] d3dx9_36: Implement D3DXCheckTextureRequirements + tests
À: wine-devel@winehq.org
Date: Lundi 19 avril 2010, 11h43
On 19 April 2010 09:43, Christian C
On 19 April 2010 19:43, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 19 April 2010 09:43, Christian Costa wrote:
>> +BOOL is_pow2(UINT num)
>> +{
>> + UINT i;
>> +
>> + if (!num) return FALSE;
>> + for (i = 0; num >> 1; i++) num >>= 1;
>> +
>> + return (num << i) == num;
>> +}
> This should at least be
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1576
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1574
Your paranoid android.
On 19 April 2010 09:43, Christian Costa wrote:
> +BOOL is_pow2(UINT num)
> +{
> +UINT i;
> +
> +if (!num) return FALSE;
> +for (i = 0; num >> 1; i++) num >>= 1;
> +
> +return (num << i) == num;
> +}
This should at least be static. You can also just replace it with
"return !(num & (
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Marcus Meissner writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Win32 ABI has its stack arguments aligned at 4 (2^2) bytes.
> > For MMX/SSE operations we however need to have the stack aligned
> > to 16 (2^4).
> >
> > So specify this explicitly.
Marcus Meissner writes:
> Hi,
>
> The Win32 ABI has its stack arguments aligned at 4 (2^2) bytes.
> For MMX/SSE operations we however need to have the stack aligned
> to 16 (2^4).
>
> So specify this explicitly.
>
> (This should probably be even part of attribute((stdcall)) perhaps
> in gcc. Not
Hi Ge,
On 04/19/2010 10:18 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
Hi Paul,
From: Paul Vriens [mailto:paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com]
On 04/19/2010 09:46 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
- Skip tests if required DLL is not available
Winetest.exe has some extra testing for com and .net provided dll's.
Does the testbot t
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 04:28:54PM -0600, Charles Davis wrote:
> On 4/18/10 4:17 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Win32 ABI has its stack arguments aligned at 4 (2^2) bytes.
> > For MMX/SSE operations we however need to have the stack aligned
> > to 16 (2^4).
> >
> > So specify this
Hi Paul,
> From: Paul Vriens [mailto:paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com]
> > On 04/19/2010 09:46 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
> > - Skip tests if required DLL is not available
>
> Winetest.exe has some extra testing for com and .net provided dll's.
> Does the testbot take this into account as well?
I starte
On 04/19/2010 09:46 AM, Greg Geldorp wrote:
I've made a bunch of changes to TestBot, aimed at improving its reliability
for processing wine-patches submissions and preventing false positives (where
the bot incorrectly claims a patch introduces a new failure.) For the moment
it won't send error re
I've made a bunch of changes to TestBot, aimed at improving its reliability
for processing wine-patches submissions and preventing false positives (where
the bot incorrectly claims a patch introduces a new failure.) For the moment
it won't send error reports directly to wine-devel, instead it sends
40 matches
Mail list logo