Hi James,
On Tuesday 20 July 2010 03:43:39 James McKenzie wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
> > 2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
> >> The tests will be a problem, because I don't have the Windows machine as
> >> a reference. Also `make test` fails on DirectX tests for me because of
> >> r600 driver bug..
Hi Stefan,
On Tuesday 20 July 2010 00:01:13 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am 19.07.2010 um 21:24 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On Monday 19 July 2010 20:56:35 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> >> Allowing the creation of the surface is most likely not enough, the
> >> backbuffer has to be us
M> VM StatusNumber of test failures
M> WINEBUILDcompleted
M> W98SEcompleted 0
M> WNT4WSSP6completed 0
M> W2KPROSP4completed 0
M> WXPPROSP3completed 0
M> W2K3R2SESP2 completed 0
M> WVISTAADMco
On 07/19/2010 08:59 PM, Misha Koshelev wrote:
Unfortunately, the more intuitive
git format-patch -k --stdout HEAD~79..HEAD~78> /tmp/patch.old
does not seem to result in patches that can be properly applied onto a
different (upstream) remote (see below).
Works fine here. You must have had some
Quoth Linus:
"Ask the Wine people what strange open-function-from-hell they are
interested in."
Full message follows. Discussion archived at e.g.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127955270231189&w=2
-- Forwarded message --
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:17
My apologies, but it seems that only such a convoluted shell script
seems to achieve the correct results for different remotes:
http://wiki.winehq.org/GitWine#head-3fe70b8c0310e61d94ba30fe7edf19bd0630e1ef
If anyone has a simpler solution, I can definitely update.
Unfortunately, the more intuitiv
Austin English wrote:
2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
The tests will be a problem, because I don't have the Windows machine as a
reference. Also `make test` fails on DirectX tests for me because of r600
driver bug...
When I write CreateSurface tests (for various interfaces), is there a way for
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3549
Your paranoid android.
Dear All:
I am very very sorry for the spam I have created via my testbot failures. I
have struggled quite a bit merging my git repository with upstream Wine
today.
In fact, when I generated individual patches using git-format-patch from my
GitHub repository and then used git-am on the correspond
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3541
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3538
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3542
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3542
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3535
Your paranoid android.
Following the question as to how to implement D3DXCreateTeapot, might I
suggest making it in the form of a wine glass?
Given that is unlikely to negatively affect anything (indeed the entire
method does border on the ridiculous) I think it would make a nice hidden
touch.
Regards
Ian
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3533
Your paranoid android.
Am 19.07.2010 um 21:24 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Monday 19 July 2010 20:56:35 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>> Allowing the creation of the surface is most likely not enough, the
>> backbuffer has to be useable after it has been created. Specifically, when
>> the app attaches the ba
On Monday 19 July 2010 21:41:26 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
> > I will enhance the log message, no problem here. Should I consider the
> > referenced patch as being applied (so that I should base my patch on it)?
>
> Yeah.
Ok, I will update it according to your changes :-)
2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
> I will enhance the log message, no problem here. Should I consider the
> referenced patch as being applied (so that I should base my patch on it)?
>
Yeah.
> The tests will be a problem, because I don't have the Windows machine as a
> reference. Also `make test` fails
Hi Stefan,
On Monday 19 July 2010 20:56:35 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Allowing the creation of the surface is most likely not enough, the
> backbuffer has to be useable after it has been created. Specifically, when
> the app attaches the backbuffer to the frontbuffer(assuming this works,
> needs a t
2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
> The tests will be a problem, because I don't have the Windows machine as a
> reference. Also `make test` fails on DirectX tests for me because of r600
> driver bug...
>
> When I write CreateSurface tests (for various interfaces), is there a way for
> me to run the tes
Hi Henri,
On Monday 19 July 2010 20:07:08 Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
> > This fixes bug #9008.
>
> Please provide a more descriptive log message, and consider writing a
> test. I'm also pretty sure this will conflict with
> http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/63676.
I
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> Sorry to bother - apparently Owen Rudge has done quite a bit of basic
> texture work, so I will await his patches to start my texture work.
>
> As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is:
> http://www.w
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 20:49 +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am 19.07.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Misha Koshelev:
> > As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is:
> > http://www.winehq.org/license
> > GPL 2.1
> Actually, it is LGPL 2.1.
>
> I don't know the definite answer to your
Allowing the creation of the surface is most likely not enough, the backbuffer
has to be useable after it has been created. Specifically, when the app
attaches the backbuffer to the frontbuffer(assuming this works, needs a test)
wined3d has to be made aware of the change - there's a SetFrontBack
Am 19.07.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Misha Koshelev:
> As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is:
> http://www.winehq.org/license
> GPL 2.1
Actually, it is LGPL 2.1.
I don't know the definite answer to your real question though, and I'll abstain
from spreading suspicions :-)
On 19 July 2010 20:33, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is:
> http://www.winehq.org/license
> GPL 2.1
>
Well, Wine is LGPL 2.1 or later. I didn't say you *should* look at
freeglut, just that freeglut is probably safer to look at than GLUT.
(A
Dear All:
Sorry to bother - apparently Owen Rudge has done quite a bit of basic
texture work, so I will await his patches to start my texture work.
As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is:
http://www.winehq.org/license
GPL 2.1
Freeglut is
"freeglut is released under t
2010/7/19 Oldřich Jedlička :
> This fixes bug #9008.
Please provide a more descriptive log message, and consider writing a
test. I'm also pretty sure this will conflict with
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/63676.
Hello Jacek,
first of all, thank you for this detailed explanation.
Am 19.07.2010 17:11, schrieb Jacek Caban:
Hi Thomas,
On 7/19/10 3:29 PM, Thomas Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Hello,
I am interested to port the wine interface to the xulrunner back to
mswindows to access the xulrunner via a IE co
On 07/19/2010 11:01 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Hi Andrew.
While reading your Patches, i stumble over deadbeef.
We use the value 0xdeadbeef almost everywhere in the tests
to initialize a variable to an unusual value.
Using deadbeef as a variable name looks strange and make the
code harder to
On 19 July 2010 17:51, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> -if (((IWineD3DDeviceImpl
> *)shader->baseShader.device)->strided_streams.position_transformed)
> +if (device->strided_streams.position_transformed)
You might as well replace both instances.
Hi Andrew.
While reading your Patches, i stumble over deadbeef.
We use the value 0xdeadbeef almost everywhere in the tests
to initialize a variable to an unusual value.
Using deadbeef as a variable name looks strange and make the
code harder to read and understand.
Please change the name in you
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 01:58:07PM +0100, Huw Davies wrote:
> ---
> dlls/ole32/ole2.c | 199
> 1 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Please use the updated version which has fixed a typo in a comment
(spotted by Detlef).
Hi Thomas,
On 7/19/10 3:29 PM, Thomas Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Hello,
I am interested to port the wine interface to the xulrunner back to
mswindows to access the xulrunner via a IE compatible interface. So it
would be easy to replace an embedded IE with the gecko-engine.
After some code browsing
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Thomas Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am interested to port the wine interface to the xulrunner back to
> mswindows to access the xulrunner via a IE compatible interface. So it would
> be easy to replace an embedded IE with the gecko-engine.
> Aft
Hello,
I am interested to port the wine interface to the xulrunner back to
mswindows to access the xulrunner via a IE compatible interface. So it
would be easy to replace an embedded IE with the gecko-engine.
After some code browsing I thing it will be some of the "DLLs",
especially mshtml and
Austin English writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/dinput8/dinput8_main.c b/dlls/dinput8/dinput8_main.c
> index 87dd07b..416e355 100644
> --- a/dlls/dinput8/dinput8_main.c
> +++ b/dlls/dinput8/dinput8_main.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI DECLSPEC_HOTPATCH
> DirectInput8Create(HINSTANCE hinst, DWORD
2010/7/18 Mariusz Pluciński :
> +static HRESULT WINAPI gameuxcf_QueryInterface(
> +IClassFactory *iface,
> +REFIID riid,
> +LPVOID *ppobj )
> +{
> +if (IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IUnknown) ||
> +IsEqualGUID(riid, &IID_IClassFactory))
> +{
> +IClassFactory_AddRef( ifa
2010/7/18 Mariusz Pluciński :
> +static HINSTANCE hInstance;
This is unused.
You're mixing tabs and spaces, and have a couple of trailing spaces.
Also:
> + * DllRegisterServer (OLEAUT32.@)
Paul Chitescu writes:
> The "buffer" argument is not to void but the corresponding structures and
> constants are missing in wine includes.
>
> Would you want first to have that structures copied from MSDN?
Yes, of course you need to define them. You also need to add the
function prototype to t
On Monday 19 July 2010 03:25:15 pm Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul Chitescu writes:
>
> > @@ -3323,6 +3323,26 @@ HANDLE WINAPI GetCurrentProcess(void)
> > }
> >
> > /***
> > + * GetLogicalProcessorInformation (
David Hedberg writes:
> ---
> dlls/shell32/shell32.spec |2 +-
> dlls/shell32/shell32_main.h|5 -
> dlls/shell32/shlmenu.c |2 +-
> dlls/shell32/tests/shlfileop.c | 14 +++---
> dlls/shell32/undocshell.h |4
> include/shlobj.h
Paul Chitescu writes:
> @@ -3323,6 +3323,26 @@ HANDLE WINAPI GetCurrentProcess(void)
> }
>
> /***
> + * GetLogicalProcessorInformation (KERNEL32.@)
> + */
> +BOOL WINAPI GetLogicalProcessorInformation(void *buff
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3514
Your paranoid android.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3510
Your paranoid android.
On 17 July 2010 21:14, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> @@ -636,6 +636,10 @@ static void D3DXCreateBoxTest(void)
> IDirect3DVertexBuffer9_Release(vertex_buffer);
> }
>
> + /* Index buffer */
> + number_of_faces = box->lpVtbl->GetNumFaces(box);
> + todo_wine ok( numb
On 17 July 2010 21:13, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> ---
> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> index cac515e..401e61e 100644
> --- a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> +++ b/dlls/d3
Same comments apply as for the previous patches. With this being a
larger dataset it makes even more sense to calculate the vertices
instead of hardcoding them.
On 17 July 2010 21:13, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> +#include
You don't use that in this patch.
> + D3DXVECTOR3 test_vertex_data[8];
I think it makes sense to use the same kind of structure you're using
in your implementation of D3DXCreateSphere() here.
> + if (vertex_data)
> +
On 17 July 2010 21:13, Misha Koshelev wrote:
> + if (hr == D3D_OK)
> + {
> + todo_wine ok( vertex_buffer_description.Format ==
> D3DFMT_VERTEXDATA, "Got result %x, expected %x
> (D3DFMT_VERTEXDATA)\n",vertex_buffer_description.Format,D3DFMT_VERTEXDATA);
> +
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3509
Your paranoid android.
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://test
53 matches
Mail list logo
