Hi Vitaliy,
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 01/30/2011 04:16 AM, Peter Schlaile wrote:
Hi,
find fix for a crash in create_alpha_bitmap() attached.
If it's easy to reproduce please create a test that demonstrates the problem.
hmm, don't know, the application that triggered
> > If I need to make changes to, say, test cases, should I also send bug fix
> > patch again even if there is no changes to that?
>
> Please. If it is two separate patches, be sure to make it a series
> (label them 1/2, 2/2) and that the tests pass before/after each patch.
>
Ok, thanks for the
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 22:15, Janne Hakonen wrote:
>>Also, it is custom to mark your resubmissions with corrections as [try x].
>> Makes it easier to determine what you are doing.
> I posted my patches to patches mailing list only once so far, so there
> hasn't been any retries yet.
> But, I shal
> Did you try this on WindowsXP or Windows7 to make sure that the
win_skip did not function on those platforms? My understanding is
that win_skip works on all Windows platforms not just WindowsNT or
Windows2000.
Well, I did test that skip doesn't happen on my home computer, whic
On 01/30/2011 12:02 PM, Peter Schlaile wrote:
Nevertheless: I hope, I explained pretty well, how and why the current code
is wrong (aquiring a bitmap-pointer using CreateDIBSection, setting this
bitmap to readonly using the fast track code path within StretchDIBits,
writing to this bitmap again.)
On 1/28/11 11:54 AM, Janne Hakonen wrote:
> Now, when I ran these tests on Testbot using all base VMs, the tests
were run also on W2KPROSP4 and WNT4WSSP6. However, the
> function seems to buggy in those. It throws access violation
whenever it is not skipping frames.
> Is there some way I could
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8753
Your paranoid android.
On 28 January 2011 17:36, Juan Lang wrote:
> What's the issue with building GnuTLS? Is it that GnuTLS doesn't
> support the Mac Keychain? Is it that it's an external dependency? If
> the latter, we already pull in quite a bit that isn't found on the
> Mac, so the incremental change isn't large.
On 1/28/11 9:36 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
Hi Ken,
I'm planning to add an alternative implementation of schannel (SSL/TLS) support
for the Mac. The current implementation is based on GnuTLS. That library is
not typically found on Mac OS X. Although packagers can build it and ship it
and its dep
On 01/30/2011 07:27 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
I think Dan Kegel does not want them in the Winetest list. I'll defer
to AJ as to what HE wants.
Sure ! The boss's always right.
And it should be great to find a way to identify these "fake" windows.
On 01/30/2011 07:29 PM, F Capela wrote:
Couple
On 01/30/2011 04:16 AM, Peter Schlaile wrote:
Hi,
find fix for a crash in create_alpha_bitmap() attached.
If it's easy to reproduce please create a test that demonstrates the problem.
Additional minor fix: bmi_has_alpha() tests for alpha channel != 0, but
should test for alpha channel != 25
> From: GOUJON Alexandre
>
> On 01/30/2011 04:47 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
>> On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>> I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
>>> winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
>>> e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053
On 1/30/11 9:02 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
On 01/30/2011 04:47 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/42540
On 1/30/11 10:35 AM, Jack Edmonds wrote:
I recently submitted a bug
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25934). I'm not sure if I did a
good job on the submission, but if I did, I was thinking it would be a
good first bug to work on so as to introduce me to the Wine source code.
I was wonderi
I recently submitted a bug
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25934). I'm not sure if I did a
good job on the submission, but if I did, I was thinking it would be a
good first bug to work on so as to introduce me to the Wine source code.
I was wondering if someone could help me get started on
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8728
Your paranoid android.
On 01/29/2011 12:21 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Hi Albert,
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ?action=diff&rev2=384&rev1=383 looks
like it was a pretty big edit.
Try smaller ones, and try to do just one kind of change per edit.
That, and the fact that some changes where questionable, and broken:
-cd ~/.wine
> I mean, yeah it's not legal, it's bad and what you want but what about if
> they provide results that differ from the daily bot results ?
So what? You know that the Windows software may have changed, and you
can't replicate the results yourself (unless you also feel like
breaking the law).
> D
On 01/30/2011 04:47 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053/MicroXP_v0.82_-_eXPerience
Agreed?
+1.
On 1/27/11 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I suspect that we should discourage people from submitting
winetest results from 3rd party repackagings of Microsoft Windows,
e.g. http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4254053/MicroXP_v0.82_-_eXPerience
Agreed?
+1. And that is a pirate version of Windows anyway.
On 1/29/11 6:53 AM, Qian Hong wrote:
Dear all,
While test another online bank with wine ActiveX,
I got an unimplemented fuction of ntoskrnl: IoGetDeviceInterfaces,
I found it listed in http://source.winehq.org/WineAPI/ntoskrnl.html as a stup,
so I can't understand this log:
wine: Unimplemented fu
21 matches
Mail list logo
