2011/7/26 André Hentschel :
> Am 26.07.2011 01:17, schrieb Austin English:
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 19:15, Austin English wrote:
>>> Web space usage was getting a bit high, so I've uploaded a tarball to
>>> a file download service:
>>> http://www.sendspace.com/file/5hot36
>>>
>>> austin@aw21 ~ $
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12931
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12930
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12932
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12933
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12934
Your paranoid android
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> - char src_bmibuf[FIELD_OFFSET( BITMAPINFO, bmiColors[256] )];
> - BITMAPINFO *src_info = (BITMAPINFO *)src_bmibuf;
> - char dst_bmibuf[FIELD_OFFSET( BITMAPINFO, bmiColors[256] )];
> - BITMAPINFO *dst_info = (BITMAPINFO *)dst_bm
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12928
Your paranoid android
2011/7/27 :
>
> Hi,
>
> there is bug 27908, which i closed as invalid, because user did not
> used latest fixed version.
>
>
> AJ says: If there was a bug then it's FIXED.
>
>
> Based on that, even if the user has a crash in 1.0.1 and opens _now_
> a bug and one day later says "it is FIXED in 1.3.
Hi,
I was trying out the latest SysInternals Process Explorer and it struck
me that the overall CPU % stayed at 0.
Adding some values to the sppi structure fixed this but I'm just
wondering what values to use:
sppi[cpus-1].Reserved1[0].QuadPart = (ULONGLONG)remainder[0] *
1000 / clk_
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 16:43:36 Owen Rudge wrote:
> I'd be interested if there's a space going free. We just get to send 2
> mentors though as I understand it?
Yes. I'd be interested as well, that's why I started this thread. I've been
there already in 2009, so if anyone else wants to go I'd be
Hi,
I've never seen a documentation of what Wine expects from the
ALSA/OSS/CoreAudio device.
- A bare bones "hw:0" device with all its restrictions, e.g. stereo
16bit only? As Wine provides no mixer, this would disallow playing
multiple sounds concurrently (bug #NN) on most current sound ca
The gsoc mentor summit organizing is getting started. Do any fellow mentors
want to travel there?
I'd be interested if there's a space going free. We just get to send 2
mentors though as I understand it?
Cheers,
--
Owen Rudge
http://www.owenrudge.net/
Hi,
The gsoc mentor summit organizing is getting started. Do any fellow mentors
want to travel there?
http://gsoc-wiki.osuosl.org/index.php/2011
Stefan
PS: I vaguely remember that we once had a separate mailing list for gsoc stuff
like that, but I can't find it, only Dan Kegel's old wine-gsoc
Hi,
there is bug 27908, which i closed as invalid, because user did not
used latest fixed version.
AJ says: If there was a bug then it's FIXED.
Based on that, even if the user has a crash in 1.0.1 and opens _now_
a bug and one day later says "it is FIXED in 1.3.25", then it should
be marked a
15 matches
Mail list logo