On 10/20/2011 02:34 PM, L. Rahyen wrote:
If such a system will be used, I will volunteer too. By the way, I
like this idea because I think it can prevent all or almost all spam
(most spammers never post "intelligent posts").
It would definitely be an improvement. I moderate in some other tec
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15042
Your paranoid android
On 10/20/2011 06:26 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 10/20/2011 06:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wrote:
device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
make
On 10/20/2011 06:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wrote:
device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
make: *** [device.ok] Error 8
Could be because of
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:13, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
> Full results can be found at
> http://testbo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wrote:
>>> device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
>>> device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
>>> make: *** [device.ok] Error 8
>
> Could be because of definition problems. Here's wha
Could be because of definition problems. Here's what I get compiling wine64:
../../../../wine.git/dlls/dinput/tests/device.c:117:5: warning: comparison
is always false due to limited range of data type
../../../../wine.git/dlls/dinput/tests/device.c:120:5: warning: comparison
is always false due
Fails to build here?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
> This is an experimental automated build and test service.
> Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
>
> For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot
>
> The Buildbot has detected a
Fails to build here?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:51 PM, wrote:
> This is an experimental automated build and test service.
> Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
>
> For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot
>
> The Buildbot has detected a
On 2011-10-20 (October, Thursday) 19:17:56 Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
> > Quarantine new users' posts until approved by a human moderator. After a
> > few intelligent posts, grant the user unmoderated posting privilege.
> > The Boost mailing list
Here here
On 20/10/11 8:17 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
I think that's a great system, but you'll need volunteers :) I can
volunteer for that matter, but I won't exactly spend a lot of time on
it.
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Jerome Lecla
I think that's a great system, but you'll need volunteers :) I can
volunteer for that matter, but I won't exactly spend a lot of time on
it.
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Josh Juran wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
>
>> I don't subscribe to websites that have
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> I don't subscribe to websites that have annoying captchas either way;
> and many people are like that. Bot authors have proved they can beat
> any system; and captchas (recaptcha especially) has proved itself as
> one of the most effective an
I don't subscribe to websites that have annoying captchas either way;
and many people are like that. Bot authors have proved they can beat
any system; and captchas (recaptcha especially) has proved itself as
one of the most effective and unintrusive free captcha systems.
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 a
Isn't the system for creating new accounts only? If it's just to post
messages then anything will be annoying.
On 20/10/11 7:48 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Unless you want to implement a captcha system, any system is going to
annoy the users. Bots can be programmed to answer those fields prett
Unless you want to implement a captcha system, any system is going to
annoy the users. Bots can be programmed to answer those fields pretty
easily; if a spammer wants to get around it, they will :)
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Ken Sharp wrote:
>
>
> On 20/10/11 4:13 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
On 20/10/11 4:13 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48, Jeremy Newman wrote:
I will take suggestions on other questions that regular users can answer
easily, but would stump (for a bit anyway) a bot, or bot author.
Why not the good and old random math questions inside an image
Hi Vitaliy,
could you check on win64? I had a test failure there with your patch.
- Dan
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:49 AM, wrote:
> This is an experimental automated build and test service.
> Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
>
> For more info about this message,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> I will take suggestions on other questions that regular users can answer
> easily, but would stump (for a bit anyway) a bot, or bot author.
Why not the good and old random math questions inside an image? For
example 2 + 4 = ...
On 10/19/2011 08:03 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
The new question is:
What operating system does Wine run applications from?
Should be obvious for a human.
I will take suggestions on other questions that regular users can answer
easily, but would stump (for a bit anyway) a bot, or bot author.
Francois Gouget writes:
> @@ -72,10 +72,12 @@ static int ATTRIB_wprintf(const WCHAR *format, ...) {
> }
>
> va_start(parms, format);
> -len = vsnprintfW(output_bufW, MAX_WRITECONSOLE_SIZE/sizeof(WCHAR),
> format, parms);
> +SetLastError(NO_ERROR);
> +len = FormatMessageW(
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15023
Your paranoid android
I have two suggestions -
- git clone has a "--depth" option which does a shallow clone (i.e. with some
history removed).
- you can use "git-archive" to export arbitrary commits out as a tar ball
dynamically; there is no need to have store a tar ball permanently.
That said, I am doubtful about
23 matches
Mail list logo