Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21799
Your paranoid android
Am 25.09.2012 21:54, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> On 25 September 2012 21:12, André Hentschel wrote:
>> I don't remember the app, be free to patch it in again, at best with tests.
>>
> Wasn't that for World of Tanks?
>
Oh, true. thx.
It's all about http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27554
d08fa6
So, it seems I've screwed up this release. Sorry about that. It won't
be added to Wine, and I'll try again later.
Specifically, I messed up the flags on the mono-registry64 msi
component, and I forgot to commit the guids for the new
System.Web.Http.SelfHost msi components (which means packages bui
On 25 September 2012 21:12, André Hentschel wrote:
> I don't remember the app, be free to patch it in again, at best with tests.
>
Wasn't that for World of Tanks?
Am 25.09.2012 14:48, schrieb Aric Stewart:
>>
>>> also you eliminate the part where if the incoming hWndIME is NULL we send
>>> the message to the thread's default IME window.
>>
>> my changes made an app happy IIRC, further i think i was skeptical about
>> IMM_GetThreadData()->hwndDefault becaus
On 9/25/12 1:38 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Aric Stewart writes:
>
>> @@ -2323,12 +2323,18 @@ BOOL WINAPI ImmSetOpenStatus(HIMC hIMC, BOOL fOpen)
>>
>> if (data->imeWnd == NULL)
>> {
>> -/* create the ime window */
>> -data->imeWnd = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOL
Aric Stewart writes:
> @@ -2323,12 +2323,18 @@ BOOL WINAPI ImmSetOpenStatus(HIMC hIMC, BOOL fOpen)
>
> if (data->imeWnd == NULL)
> {
> -/* create the ime window */
> -data->imeWnd = CreateWindowExW( WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW,
> -data->immKbd->imeClassName, N
Am 25.09.2012 18:40, schrieb Qian Hong:
> Hi Juan,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
>>
>> I think this is fine, but you'd want to remove/fix some outdated
>> comments I wrote at the same time:
>
> Thank you very much!
> I'll send an improved version tomorrow since I just dr
Hi Juan,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Juan Lang wrote:
>
> I think this is fine, but you'd want to remove/fix some outdated
> comments I wrote at the same time:
Thank you very much!
I'll send an improved version tomorrow since I just drank some beer
right now and I think it is not compatibl
Hi Qian,
> There is a winpcap based network authentication client which check for the
> DhcpEnabled value, this patch make the app happy and then the app works with
> André's pcap wrapper [1].
>
> Please let me know if this is acceptable, or we have to correctly implement
> DhcpEnabled status?
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21785
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21787
Your paranoid android
Hi Andre,
On 9/24/12 3:00 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 21.09.2012 18:46, schrieb Aric Stewart:
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> I have a quick question for you. I am looking into why IME unaware
>> applications are no longer showing their composition window and found it was
>> because of:
>>
>> commit 7673
Francois Gouget writes:
> Add NULL and insufficient buffer tests for PathCreateFromUrl().
> ---
> dlls/shlwapi/path.c |3 +++
> dlls/shlwapi/tests/path.c | 49
> +
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
On 25/09/2012 8:44 PM, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDeta
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21782
Your paranoid android
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Per Johansson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I should probably add a note that when I wrote this I had some doubts it
> it
> > belongs in start.exe, and I still somewhat do.
> >
> > The alternative would be to write a new p
Ričardas Barkauskas writes:
> ---
> dlls/dxgi/tests/device.c | 69
> ++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
In general testing reference count values is not useful, unless you have
an app that depends on it.
--
Alexandre Julliard
j
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Never underestimate the overeagerness of bots, I suppose...
>
> We're getting a lot of spam applications for testbot accounts now, maybe 2-3
> per day. Some are easy to discard because they put stuff like penis pills
> into the info field, but others l
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Per Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I should probably add a note that when I wrote this I had some doubts it it
> belongs in start.exe, and I still somewhat do.
>
> The alternative would be to write a new program. The advantage to that is:
Start.exe already has a /unix option so
20 matches
Mail list logo
