On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:33:20 +0300
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> It's described here http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko. I guess failure
> message loading gecko (in load_gecko()) could be improved adding
> GECKO_VERSION to it so user clearly see what version he needs to have if
> it's somehow not downloade
On 11/27/12 16:33, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 17:26, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:32:02 +0100
>> Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>>> The idea is that Wine Gecko version could be just something based on
>>> other versions, that are more informative.
>>>
>> Users don't care what
2012/11/27 Detlef Riekenberg :
> While inspecting a test failure, i found only
> 3 possible results for the line test:
> - d3dx9_36.dll not present
> - all tests skipped
> line.c:146: Tests skipped: Failed to create IDirect3DDevice9 object
> 0x8876086c
> - refcount test failed
> line.c:113: Te
On 11/27/12 14:53, André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 27.11.2012 13:32, schrieb Jacek Caban:
>> The idea is that Wine Gecko version could be just something based on
>> other versions, that are more informative. It's not really possible to
>> use Wine version, because the first version of Wine that will us
On 11/27/2012 17:26, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:32:02 +0100
Jacek Caban wrote:
The idea is that Wine Gecko version could be just something based on
other versions, that are more informative.
Users don't care what version of Firefox the latest gecko is based on; most
don't
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:32:02 +0100
Jacek Caban wrote:
> The idea is that Wine Gecko version could be just something based on
> other versions, that are more informative.
>
Users don't care what version of Firefox the latest gecko is based on; most
don't even realize it is based on Firefox. Wh
Am 27.11.2012 13:32, schrieb Jacek Caban:
> The idea is that Wine Gecko version could be just something based on
> other versions, that are more informative. It's not really possible to
> use Wine version, because the first version of Wine that will use new
> Gecko is not ultimately when Wine Gecko
Hi all,
Since Wine Gecko 1.9 branching, the tip should bump to 1.10, but I think
it's time to clean up the situation a bit. Such things usually don't
bring much attention, but it should be decided in public. Right now we
have three versioning schemes involved in Wine Gecko:
- Wine version that app
> -BOOL __cdecl FDIIsCabinet(
>> - HFDIhfdi,
>> - INT_PTR hf,
>> - PFDICABINETINFO pfdici)
>> +BOOL __cdecl FDIIsCabinet(HFDI hfdi, INT_PTR hf, PFDICABINETINFO pfdici)
>> {
>> BOOL rv;
>> FDI_Int *fdi = get_fdi_ptr( hfdi );
>> @@ -749,13 +746,13 @@ BO
On 11/26/12 22:35, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> It's probably better to change the macro to require the semicolon.
>>
>> Jacek
> The reason I did it that way was because there are two variants of the
> DEFINE_CXX_DATA macro, surrounded by an #ifndef construct: one comprising
> thr
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:44:35PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> case DirectColor:
> X11DRV_PALETTE_PaletteFlags |= X11DRV_PALETTE_VIRTUAL;
> /* fall through */
> case GrayScale:
>
> would be more clear IMHO. Right now it's not obvious to which case statement
> 'fall throu
Huw Davies wrote:
> case DirectColor:
> X11DRV_PALETTE_PaletteFlags |= X11DRV_PALETTE_VIRTUAL;
> -case GrayScale:
> +case GrayScale: /* fall through */
case DirectColor:
X11DRV_PALETTE_PaletteFlags |= X11DRV_PALETTE_VIRTUAL;
/* fall through */
case Gray
On 11/27/2012 11:14, Christian Costa wrote:
---
dlls/cabinet/fdi.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/cabinet/fdi.c b/dlls/cabinet/fdi.c
index 0690b38..809a5c0 100644
--- a/dlls/cabinet/fdi.c
+++ b/dlls/cabinet/fdi.c
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ s
13 matches
Mail list logo
