Re: [PATCH] winetest: Add support for wineconsole output

2013-06-20 Thread Fabian Ebner
Am 20.06.2013 17:55, schrieb Bruno Jesus: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Fabian Ebner wrote: Allow winetest to output stuff inside a wineconsole. Fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28191 --- programs/winetest/gui.c | 6 +++--- programs/winetest/main.c | 2 +- program

Re: ntdll: make msync() call asynchronous in NtFlushVirtualMemory (try 3)

2013-06-20 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Mathis Beer writes: > As such, this patch changes msync to be called asynchronously. > > This is revision three of this patch. It leaves the original #define > MS_SYNC 0 in place and instead changes NtFlushVirtualMemory to use > MS_ASYNC only if mman.h was found earlier. (It also adds comments)

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ddraw: Device2 and Device3 do not have a lighting render state

2013-06-20 Thread Stefan Dösinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 2013-06-20 13:23, schrieb Henri Verbeet: >> Just to make sure I understand you correctly: You're saying that >> the test should still call SetRenderState(LIGHTING), check the >> initial value, and GetRenderState(LIGHTING) should return a >> hardcode

Re: [website] Added Portuguese translation for call for translators

2013-06-20 Thread Bruno Jesus
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > Just wondering: does it make sense to translate a call for translators? > > I mean, if a volunteer can't understand the English from the call, > (s)he wouldn't be able to translate correctly anyway. I don't see any problem in translating

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ddraw: Device2 and Device3 do not have a lighting render state

2013-06-20 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 20 June 2013 13:18, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > I don't know any application that depends on this. It just seemed like > an interesting thing to test to see how far the interaction between > the different APIs goes. > > Just to make sure I understand you correctly: You're saying that the > test sh

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ddraw: Device2 and Device3 do not have a lighting render state

2013-06-20 Thread Stefan Dösinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 2013-06-20 13:02, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > On 20 June 2013 12:17, Stefan Dösinger > wrote: >> /* Light state */ DWORD material; +DWORD dummy_rs_lighting; >> > Considering the render state doesn't exist in early ddraw versions, > do we really c

Re: [PATCH 2/4] ddraw: Send device2_Draw* through device3_Draw*

2013-06-20 Thread Stefan Dösinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 2013-06-20 13:02, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > On 20 June 2013 12:17, Stefan Dösinger > wrote: >> -return >> IDirect3DDevice7_DrawPrimitive(&device->IDirect3DDevice7_iface, >> device->primitive_type, +return >> IDirect3DDevice3_DrawPrimitive(&d

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ddraw: Device2 and Device3 do not have a lighting render state

2013-06-20 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 20 June 2013 12:17, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > /* Light state */ > DWORD material; > +DWORD dummy_rs_lighting; > Considering the render state doesn't exist in early ddraw versions, do we really care that its value is preserved? It seems unlikely that anything except our tests would

Re: [PATCH 2/4] ddraw: Send device2_Draw* through device3_Draw*

2013-06-20 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 20 June 2013 12:17, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > -return IDirect3DDevice7_DrawPrimitive(&device->IDirect3DDevice7_iface, > device->primitive_type, > +return IDirect3DDevice3_DrawPrimitive(&device->IDirect3DDevice3_iface, > device->primitive_type, > device->vertex_type, device

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ddraw: SPECULARENABLE defaults to true in IDirect3DDevice2

2013-06-20 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 20 June 2013 12:17, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > @@ -4250,7 +4250,12 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI d3d2_CreateDevice(IDirect3D2 > *iface, REFCLSID riid, > wined3d_mutex_lock(); > hr = d3d_device_create(ddraw, surface_impl, 2, &device_impl, NULL); > if (SUCCEEDED(hr)) > +{ >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] d3d9/tests: Reset texture 0 to NULL at the end of texop_test().

2013-06-20 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 19 June 2013 21:59, Matteo Bruni wrote: > While it doesn't really matter for the test results (it only affects the > alpha component of the following test but that isn't checked anyway) I feel > it's a good idea to properly cleanup and avoid dependencies between > tests. Yeah, though ideally we

talking about web-based translation again -- transifex

2013-06-20 Thread qing xianhao
hi all, firstly, i didn't use launchpad so much, but i used transifex for a mouths help to translate several opensource projects including the transifex itself. i found it can answer these needs as commented following. Quoted from http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-September/092047.h