Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26628
Your paranoid android
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26627
Your paranoid android
Hi Andre,
-/* this is a io heavy test, do it at the end so the kernel doesn't
start dropping packets */
+/* this is a heavy io test, do it at the end so the kernel doesn't
start dropping packets */
To my eyes, this isn't an improvement. A slight improvement might be "this
is a io-heavy te
On 8/6/2013 11:09, Álvaro Nieto wrote:
This patch solves [Bug 34211]. The implementation of strncpy function
doesn't compliant with C standard [1]. Also Microsoft Visual Studio
C/C++ compiler is ok with the standard [2].
Extract from msdn;
"The strncpy function copies the initial count charac