Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ typedef struct > const IClassFactoryVtbl *lpVtbl; > } ClassFactoryImpl; > > +/* This makes it easier to upgrade to IBackgroundCopyJob3, > IBackgroundCopyJob4, > + and whatever else MS decides to tack on later. */ > +typedef IBackgroundCopyJob2 BITS_IBackgroundCopyJob;
Please don't do that, vtable entries should use the correct types, otherwise it will be very confusing. You'll just have to rename them when switching to a newer version of the interface. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
