Ken Thomases wrote:
> > Please add a message test instead, it would much more clearer show what is
> > going on.
>
> I added to the existing tests of WM_CANCELMODE because that's what this new
> test is. It's just like the existing tests except with a different way of
> initiating menu tracking
On May 17, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Ken Thomases wrote:
>
>> dlls/user32/tests/menu.c | 21 -
>
> Please add a message test instead, it would much more clearer show what is
> going on.
I added to the existing tests of WM_CANCELMODE because that's what t
Ken Thomases wrote:
> dlls/user32/tests/menu.c | 21 -
Please add a message test instead, it would much more clearer show what is
going on.
> +{MSG msg; while (PeekMessage(&msg, 0, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE))
> DispatchMessage(&msg);}
Please avoid creating such embedded block
