Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Reece Dunn
On 05/02/2008, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If some people went through the trouble of using buildid's and not the > > precompiled winetest, along with documenting their hardware/OS on a > > wiki page, for instance, then we could more information on where > > specific failures are oc

Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Paul Vriens
Hi Jeremy, Jeremy White wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> Something we also have with the current tests is that the source files >> actually >> point to the correct version in CVS. I now see some strange links to refs on >> http://test.winehq.org/data/20080205/. > > Well, I'm afraid I'd argue that the cur

Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Jeremy White
> If some people went through the trouble of using buildid's and not the > precompiled winetest, along with documenting their hardware/OS on a > wiki page, for instance, then we could more information on where > specific failures are occuring. For instance, I noticed Joapa was > reporting some MSI

Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Jeremy White
Jeremy White wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> Something we also have with the current tests is that the source files >> actually >> point to the correct version in CVS. I now see some strange links to refs on >> http://test.winehq.org/data/20080205/. > > Well, I'm afraid I'd argue that the current tests s

Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Austin English
On Feb 5, 2008 10:30 AM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The good thing about having the winetest from one > source(http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/paulm/WRT/CrossBuilt/) is that all the > output is actually from the same executable and it's easier to compare. If > people are usin

Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Jeremy White
Hi Paul, > Something we also have with the current tests is that the source files > actually > point to the correct version in CVS. I now see some strange links to refs on > http://test.winehq.org/data/20080205/. Well, I'm afraid I'd argue that the current tests should be updated to point to git

Re: Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Paul Vriens
Jeremy White wrote: > Okay, so I got winetest to do something rational, and now I'd like to see if > it > will work for someone else. > > It's easy! > > Just apply this patch to a current Wine tree: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-February/049675.html > > Then configure an

Call for winetest ing

2008-02-05 Thread Jeremy White
Okay, so I got winetest to do something rational, and now I'd like to see if it will work for someone else. It's easy! Just apply this patch to a current Wine tree: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-February/049675.html Then configure and make Wine as you normally would. Then,