Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-10-01 Thread Darragh Bailey
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:53:17PM -0500, Austin English wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jeremy White wrote: > >> We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re: > >> > >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728 > >> > >> There were s

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-10-01 Thread Markus Hitter
While on the topic, please remove Mac OS up to 10.3 from the list of operating systems. Mac OS X 10.4.x was the first publicly available Macintosh OS running on Intel processors, so there won't ever be anybody running Wine on e.g. MacOS 9. MarKus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl.

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-30 Thread Lei Zhang
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:35 PM, wineappdb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not offer version + (GIT) e.g "1.1.5 GIT" or e.g "1.1.5+" ? > And to pick it offer a combo box "Release" or "Git" then you pick your wine > version. That'll double the number of Wine versions, and make searching much hard

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-30 Thread wineappdb
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:46:17 -0700 James McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > > --- On Sun, 28/9/08, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The con is actually less trouble than you think - if somebody reports > > a bug against CVS/GIT, it would be reasonab

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-29 Thread Austin English
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy White wrote: >> We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re: >> >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728 >> >> There were several points of consensus. First, it would be helpful >> if we could reduce th

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-28 Thread James McKenzie
Hin-Tak Leung wrote: > --- On Sun, 28/9/08, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The con is actually less trouble than you think - if somebody reports > a bug against CVS/GIT, it would be reasonable to assume that the > report date is within a day or two compared to the git > clone/reb

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-28 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
--- On Sun, 28/9/08, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Second, we'd like new bug reporters to not be able to > use > the 'CVS/GIT' version choice, but to instead be > encouraged to > report the current version. (wine --version reports > something > that is easy to match up to the choices)

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-28 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
James Hawkins wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jeremy White wrote: >>> Second, we'd like new bug reporters to not be able to use >>> the 'CVS/GIT' version choice, but to instead be encouraged to >>> report the current version. (wine --versi

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-28 Thread James Hawkins
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy White wrote: >> We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re: >> >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728 >> >> There were several points of consensus. First, it would be helpful >> if we could reduce th

Re: Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-28 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Jeremy White wrote: > We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re: > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728 > > There were several points of consensus. First, it would be helpful > if we could reduce the number of versions visible in the drop down > box when entering a new bug. That

Discussion of bug versions

2008-09-28 Thread Jeremy White
We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728 There were several points of consensus. First, it would be helpful if we could reduce the number of versions visible in the drop down box when entering a new bug. That would seem to require a bugzilla c