Octavian,
>I just looked in mmddk.h and they have this:
>#define MCI_INTEGER64 13
It's good you found out about MCI_INTEGER64. Yet it's completely crazy because
googling it yields 6 hits in total, all about Wine bug 22146.
Bing shows nothing at all. How can such a name be that invisible?
>So, d
Octavian Voicu writes:
> The reason for which I opted for a BYTE* is so that I can use sizeof()
> to increment the pointer correctly. DWORD_PTR has a different size of
> 32- and 64-bit systems, so using DWORD* would make it more complicated
> to increment with sizeof(DWORD_PTR). Another reason is
Same here.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Octavian Voicu
Date: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit.
To: joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Octavian Voicu
wrote:
> I just looked in
For some reason I forgot to hit reply to all.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Octavian Voicu
Date: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit.
To: joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:11 PM, wrot
