>How about an one line test case which simply does
>ret = DefWindowProc(hwnd, WM_MOUSEACTIVATE, 0, HTNOWHERE);
>ok(ret == MA_ACTIVATE, "expected to return MA_ACTIVATE\n");
Yes, the patch does that (via the window proc for the test, but it gets
forwarded on as its not handled). I didn't think of dr
"Ann & Jason Edmeades" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under wine, our defwinproc was not returning MA_ACTIVATE for HTNOWHERE
> (0x), and a simple change confirmed that returning that did indeed fix
> the problem. That leaves the question as to whether the change is right.
>
> I've attached a pa
