Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-11-04 Thread Martin Bosner
On Saturday 06 October 2007 17:12:51 Dan Kegel wrote: > On 10/6/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleaseCriteria > > > > Can find get a timeline for the feature freeze and the 1.0 release? > > As the wiki page says, we hope to have a "final" list of bugs >

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-16 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 20:35:26 Denali Coldstar wrote: > Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes: > >* > > *>* At Wineconf 2007, I was appointed to be the guy who decides > *>* (with Alexandre's approval) what bugs are 1.0 bugs and what aren't. > *>* So I've started adjusting the "Target Release" fields o

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-09 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Samstag, 6. Oktober 2007 13:41:43 schrieb Dan Kegel: > Over the next month or so, I'd like Wine developers to nominate important > bugs for 1.0 by setting their "target release" field to 1.0. Later on > we'll clean up and freeze the list somehow. I think all the remaining DirectDraw rewrite reg

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-07 Thread Jaime Andres
I would like to propose this one: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5351 2007/10/7, Karl Relton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I would like consideration given to > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739 > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362 > > I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe mig

RE: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-07 Thread Karl Relton
I would like consideration given to http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3739 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4362 I would imagine Adobe PhotoDeluxe might be quite common among home users (who may get a copy with their digital camera, and not fork out for full Photoshop). The other bug

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-07 Thread Louis Lenders
Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes: > > Louis wrote: > > Ok, here one on my wish-list: > > All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality. > > Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in > http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw > briefly, and marked a

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-07 Thread Dan Kegel
Louis wrote: > Ok, here one on my wish-list: > All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality. Hmm. I looked at the 48 bugs in http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?product=Wine&component=wine-shdocvw briefly, and marked a few of them that looked important as 1.0. See

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Louis Lenders
Ok, here one on my wish-list: All apps that currently fail on wine due to shdocvw/mshtml disfunctionality. Almost all of these apps start fine using ies4linux. I did quite a lot of testing of demo's, and many of them fail because of this (in most cases you just end up with a white screen). Actua

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Evil Jay
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6155 also holds up quite a few apps (some listed at http://wiki.winehq.org/IoCompletionPorts). Fixing it would make Wine feel a lot more 1.0ish to me. -J, Klaus Layer wrote: > On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:41:43 Dan Kegel wrote: > >> At Wineconf 2007, I

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Dan Kegel
On 10/6/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleaseCriteria > > Can find get a timeline for the feature freeze and the 1.0 release? As the wiki page says, we hope to have a "final" list of bugs by the end of the year. There have been some murmurings about try

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Jesse Allen
On 10/6/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At Wineconf 2007, I was appointed to be the guy who decides > (with Alexandre's approval) what bugs are 1.0 bugs and what aren't. > So I've started adjusting the "Target Release" fields on a few > bugs in Bugzilla. > Over the next month or so, I'd

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Klaus Layer
On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:41:43 Dan Kegel wrote: > At Wineconf 2007, I was appointed to be the guy who decides > (with Alexandre's approval) what bugs are 1.0 bugs and what aren't. > So I've started adjusting the "Target Release" fields on a few > bugs in Bugzilla. > Over the next month or so,

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Dan Kegel
Louis Lenders wrote: > Maybe it's an idea to say "if a bug includes at least 5 duplicates >(so 5 apps suffering from the same bug) it can be automatically > boosted to the 1.0 target release". I was especially thinking of bug #7380. > ( http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7380 ) That's not a ba

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Louis Lenders
Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes: > > At Wineconf 2007, I was appointed to be the guy who decides > (with Alexandre's approval) what bugs are 1.0 bugs and what aren't. > So I've started adjusting the "Target Release" fields on a few > bugs in Bugzilla. > Over the next month or so, I'd like Wine devel

Re: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread Dan Kegel
On 10/6/07, EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleaseCriteria > > I still have a whole slew of older applications(about 30-40 of them) that > won't work because of just 3 bugs. > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3743 > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?i

RE: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria

2007-10-06 Thread EA Durbin
> Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:41:43 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > wine-devel@winehq.org> Subject: Wine 1.0 bugs, release criteria> > At > Wineconf 2007, I was appointed to be the guy who decides> (with Alexandre's > approval) what bugs are 1.0 bugs and what aren't.> So I've started adjusti