About uninitalizing the length variable, if the tests bomb in windows,
dont ask me.
well i will put them in anew patch once this gets accepted. i have
still some more tests and implementation to go.
This is just the beggining.
Thanks,
Vijay
PS:
-
Why this always happens to me :( .
On 11/9/05,
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In your Last suggestion if i initialize the length variable in the
> > > tests, the native simply gives garbage, thats inorder to make the test
> > > pass.
> >
> I too dont know much about how use the wininet apis, i just wrote a
> simple test
On 11/9/05, Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have made changes, sending them soon.
> > Dimitry:
> > In your first suggestion, i think using a new variable is not a good
> > idea. It has been done like that for all options and prev
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have made changes, sending them soon.
> Dimitry:
> In your first suggestion, i think using a new variable is not a good
> idea. It has been done like that for all options and previously for
> the same options. next time i will think of something
I tried in test program initilizing the length varaible like
DWORD len=0;
Then its giving me garbage, didnt try other possibilities.
Thanks,
Vijay
On 11/9/05, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In your third suggestion, you
On 11/9/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In your third suggestion, you asked me not to set to 0, if set to
> 0xdeadbeef, that means i have to check for 0xdeadbeef. :(. when does
> API set its error to 0, what might be the cases generally.
>
You have to set the last error to a
Hi,
I have made changes, sending them soon.
Dimitry:
In your first suggestion, i think using a new variable is not a good
idea. It has been done like that for all options and previously for
the same options. next time i will think of something valid.
In your third suggestion, you asked me not to se
Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_ASYNC:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_ASYNC_ID:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_ASYNC_PRIORITY:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_CALLBACK_FILTER:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_CODEPAGE:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_CONNECT_BACKOFF:
+case
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:07:57AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Vijay Kiran Kamuju" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > + char useragent[] = {'W','i','n','i','n','e','t',' ','T','e','s','t',0 };
>
> char useragent[] = "Wininet Test";
>
> works just fine.
Maybe it works, but not "fine" ;)
st
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> as previous implementation had some bugs use this version
> +case INTERNET_OPTION_VERSION:
> {
> -if (*lpdwBufferLength < sizeof(HTTP_VERSION_INFO))
> -INTERNET_SetLastError(ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER);
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
