Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-21 Thread Paul Millar
On Sunday 18 November 2007 12:42:40 Paul Millar wrote: > That sounds promising. I should be able to tweak the winetest.exe build > infrastructure so it also build DLLs and executables without too much > trouble. OK, this now seems stable. The DLLs and executables are built and packaged whenever

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-19 Thread Steven Edwards
On Nov 19, 2007 5:40 AM, Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recall Alexandre saying that he wants the exposure to alternative headers > and import libraries because it brings up bugs in Wine. He also suggested > that the wininet/winsock issue could be solved by making wininet build > aga

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-19 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Monday 19 November 2007 03:55:20 Steven Edwards wrote: > The headers are not an issue because we use the Wine headers and > import libraries for the dlls. The only place there is a problem is > with wine/programs and the regression tests. They use the native > import libraries. I don't really u

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Steven Edwards
Hi, On Nov 18, 2007 8:03 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with using winsock rather than UNIX sockets is in the I/O > between a client process and the wineserver. The extra overhead it > imposes is really unavoidable, AFAICT. We're doing a context switch > to a separate pro

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Steven, > The problem is not in the makefiles, a lot of the problem is that we > are not clear on which dlls would be of use for testing in windows. I > had to go through hoops to get wininet buildable on Windows because it > uses unix sockets on Wine rather than winsock. There was quite a > pe

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Steven Edwards
On Nov 17, 2007 6:04 AM, Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The question is what dlls should we include? Something like the d3d > dll's would be useful, and a lot of other dll's (mshtml, shdocvw, etc) > probably too. Unfortunately wine won't build on mingw properly,if you > try a 'make'

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Millar
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:04:36 Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Roderick Colenbrander schreef: > > They should get updated. In case of Solaris there are some bugs which > > prevent it from running I think. In case of Windows someone needs to > > update the package. It is very useful to use some of

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-17 Thread Chris McKillroy
I compiled wine on Solaris using a .spec provided by the people of http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ Maybe contact them ? My version runs quite nice as far as i can see. Cheers

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-17 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi, Roderick Colenbrander schreef: > They should get updated. In case of Solaris there are some bugs which prevent > it from running I think. In case of Windows someone needs to update the > package. It is very useful to use some of the wine dlls (wined3d for > instance) or tests on Windows. >

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-17 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
> It appears that the links for the Windows and Solaris versions on the > winehq downloads page are very, very old. Since they're no longer > maintained, we should just remove them, yes? > > Thanks, > Scott Ritchie > They should get updated. In case of Solaris there are some bugs which prevent

Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-16 Thread Scott Ritchie
It appears that the links for the Windows and Solaris versions on the winehq downloads page are very, very old. Since they're no longer maintained, we should just remove them, yes? Thanks, Scott Ritchie