On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:56 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > I found it very handy to track down details on mswsock the other day.
> >
> > I suggest if it is to be removed instead dull it down by turning it in
> > to a list of dlls wine has and all available information in the form
> > of links for
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Edward Savage wrote:
>>> I propose we get rid of the page altogether, it's pretty much useless
>>> for figuring out how good Wine is. This is unfortunate, since it's
>>> often the first place people click.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott Ritchie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I found it very hand
Edward Savage wrote:
>> I propose we get rid of the page altogether, it's pretty much useless
>> for figuring out how good Wine is. This is unfortunate, since it's
>> often the first place people click.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott Ritchie
>>
>>
>>
>
> I found it very handy to track down details on msw
>
> I propose we get rid of the page altogether, it's pretty much useless
> for figuring out how good Wine is. This is unfortunate, since it's
> often the first place people click.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott Ritchie
>
>
>
I found it very handy to track down details on mswsock the other day.
I suggest i
Adam Petaccia wrote:
> http://winehq.org/site/status is the website showing Wine's status on
> implementing various DLLs, but it hasn't been updated in almost a year!
> The information is not only old, but Wine has added new DLLs that aren't
> listed. With Wine approaching its 1.0 release, perhaps
http://winehq.org/site/status is the website showing Wine's status on
implementing various DLLs, but it hasn't been updated in almost a year!
The information is not only old, but Wine has added new DLLs that aren't
listed. With Wine approaching its 1.0 release, perhaps it should be
decided to updat
