Well why are you 'tainting' me that I have copied from windows PSDK
all my previous patches.
Ok from now i will do using the mingw sources or something like that
for my reference.
We are doing WINDOWS api, right?
What should we use PSDK or mingw as the reference.
Here 'copied' in the sense using t
None were.
On 7/15/06, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dmitry wrote:
> Vijay wrote:
>> If you think i need to send a newer patch, i will send it monday.
>
>I hope that Alexandre won't accept this and other patches of a similar
>"style".
Indeed.
Vijay, your best bet at this point is probab
Dmitry wrote:
Vijay wrote:
If you think i need to send a newer patch, i will send it monday.
I hope that Alexandre won't accept this and other patches of a similar
"style".
Indeed.
Vijay, your best bet at this point is probably to file bug reports in
bugs.winehq.org for the compilation erro
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I havent blindly copied them.
But modified them PSDK headers for our need.
You can't do that.
But havent added any unicode things 'coz I was busy with other things.
And defered to a later patch.
I'm sorry, but this doesn't sound plausibly. Mo
shkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ChangeLog
>
> Add userenv.h for userenv.dll
It appears that you have blindly copied the PSDK header contents,
that's not allowed. Moreover some things required for pr
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ChangeLog
--------
Add userenv.h for userenv.dll
It appears that you have blindly copied the PSDK header contents,
that's not allowed. Moreover some things required for proper
compilation with and without UNICOD
