On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:41 AM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Am 08.09.2008 um 01:30 schrieb James Hawkins:
>>
>>> For example, the following is significantly easier to read:
>>>
>>>ok(result == ERROR_BU
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 08.09.2008 um 01:30 schrieb James Hawkins:
>
>> For example, the following is significantly easier to read:
>>
>>ok(result == ERROR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL ||
>>result == ERROR_INVALID_USER_BUFFER || /* win98 */
>>
Am 08.09.2008 um 01:30 schrieb James Hawkins:
> For example, the following is significantly easier to read:
>
> ok(result == ERROR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL ||
> result == ERROR_INVALID_USER_BUFFER || /* win98 */
> result == ERROR_INVALID_DATA, /* Vista */
> "Expected ERROR_BUF
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This fixes these crypt32:chain testGetCertChain tests on Vista and Windows
> 2008.
>
-ok(!ret && GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_DATA,
- "Expected ERROR_INVALID_DATA, got %d\n", GetLastError());
+ok(!ret, "Expecte
