Re: dlls/ntdll/exception.c / unit-at-a-time problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So must the argument order of EXC_CallHandler() be exactly as is? Yes, but that's really a hack, this code should be done in assembly instead of relying on the compiler behavior. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dlls/ntdll/exception.c / unit-at-a-time problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:51:50AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > Hi, > > dlls/ntdll/exception.c is showing strange behaviour. > > If compiled with -O2 it shows different behaviour than when > compiled with -O2 -fno-unit-at-a-time. > > The latter options should only be responsible for reorderin

dlls/ntdll/exception.c / unit-at-a-time problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, dlls/ntdll/exception.c is showing strange behaviour. If compiled with -O2 it shows different behaviour than when compiled with -O2 -fno-unit-at-a-time. The latter options should only be responsible for reordering functions. Is reordering of function order a problem with the DEFINE_REGS_ENTR