+/* Assume the namespace is the Assembly name */
Uh, what?
We should only be passing an assembly name to
get_file_from_strongname, not the class name. You shouldn't even have
access to the class name.
I think what you're actually doing here is skipping the assembly name
and using the
On 15/08/2013 2:41 AM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
This seems suspicious to me. You appear to be taking the namespace of
the class and assuming it's an assembly name.
Is there really no other information in the registry that could be
used to identify the assembly?
I'll have another look to see if it
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> That being said, I think this is the wrong place for this change. Method
> get_file_from_strongname [1] is better suited for that purpose IMO.
Doing it that way is probably more correct, but it's also more
dangerous because it would affect
If we have the assembly name, then we should be using that to decide
on the filename to try in the application directory, not the
namespace.
Hi Vincent,
there's no more info in the registry. At this point we have the assembly
name and we know that it is not in GAC, so either it is in current
directory or it's absent.
That being said, I think this is the wrong place for this change. Method
get_file_from_strongname [1] is better suited f
This seems suspicious to me. You appear to be taking the namespace of
the class and assuming it's an assembly name.
Is there really no other information in the registry that could be
used to identify the assembly?
