Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-04-04 Thread Austin English
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Seth Shelnutt wrote: > Alright after creating a few test scripts and playing around with things I > think I have finally settled on exactly what my proposal is. It is in three > parts, > > 1) Convert wpkg (or appDeploy) scripts into ahk scripts. I believe that I >

Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-28 Thread Seth Shelnutt
Alright after creating a few test scripts and playing around with things I think I have finally settled on exactly what my proposal is. It is in three parts, 1) Convert wpkg (or appDeploy) scripts into ahk scripts. I believe that I can convert a hundred or so without to much work. 2) I'd like to

Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-09 Thread Arjun Comar
Yea, I noticed. That's why I was planning to include various build parameters based on time constraints. On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Austin English wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Arjun Comar > wrote: > > Yea, I'm just about ready. I was going to wait until I had the initial > > bu

Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-09 Thread Austin English
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Arjun Comar wrote: > Yea, I'm just about ready. I was going to wait until I had the initial > buildbot system ready to go, but there's no reason I couldn't but my > proposal on wine-devel tonight. Quick summary of my proposal: > - Buildbot system to automate testing

Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-09 Thread Seth Shelnutt
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Dan Kegel wrote: > > Converting the wpkg scripts to appinstall doesn't > > seem like that difficult of a task, mostly just time consuming. > > It's harder than it sounds to actually get > a few useful app tests written. Plus there'll > be some work writing up and

Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-09 Thread Dan Kegel
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Seth Shelnutt wrote: >> It's harder than it sounds to actually get >> a few useful app tests written.  Plus there'll >> be some work writing up and fixing the bugs >> it uncovers. > > So then do you think it's a worthy proposal to just work on wpkg scripts? I > have

Re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-09 Thread Arjun Comar
Yea, I'm just about ready. I was going to wait until I had the initial buildbot system ready to go, but there's no reason I couldn't but my proposal on wine-devel tonight. Quick summary of my proposal: - Buildbot system to automate testing of compilation and application installation / execution (in

re: GSoC WPKG and test.winehq.org

2010-03-08 Thread Dan Kegel
> Converting the wpkg scripts to appinstall doesn't > seem like that difficult of a task, mostly just time consuming. It's harder than it sounds to actually get a few useful app tests written. Plus there'll be some work writing up and fixing the bugs it uncovers. > That is why I thinking working