On Sep 3, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>>> You mean removing protocol.c and adding all content to socket.c? If
>>> yes I would appreciate if you could do that because I don't have the
>>> git skills and wouldn't now how to sort the f
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>> You mean removing protocol.c and adding all content to socket.c? If
>> yes I would appreciate if you could do that because I don't have the
>> git skills and wouldn't now how to sort the functions inside socket.c.
> It's not that hard. Just c
On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Alexandre Julliard
> wrote:
>> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Julliard
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
You mean removing protocol.c and adding all content to socket.c? If
yes I would appreciate if you could do that because I don
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Julliard
>>> wrote:
Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Julliard
>> wrote:
>>> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
try 2:
Narrow the loop for the specified protocol
Add a
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Julliard
> wrote:
>> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> try 2:
>>> Narrow the loop for the specified protocol
>>> Add a new test for invalid sockets
>>
>> Considering wha
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> try 2:
>> Narrow the loop for the specified protocol
>> Add a new test for invalid sockets
>
> Considering what WSAEnumProtocols does, the loop doesn't seem necessary
> at all.
It will when WS
Bruno Jesus <00cp...@gmail.com> writes:
> try 2:
> Narrow the loop for the specified protocol
> Add a new test for invalid sockets
Considering what WSAEnumProtocols does, the loop doesn't seem necessary
at all.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1970
Your paranoid andr
10 matches
Mail list logo