Thanks, I clearly didn't read the line I quoted properly..
On Thu, 8 Jul 2021, 19:46 Tomasz Moń, wrote:
> On Thursday, July 8, 2021, Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev <
> wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
>
>> These mask fields (0x7f7f, 0x7f7f7f7f, etc) look wrong to me, but I am
>> worried I
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev <
wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
> These mask fields (0x7f7f, 0x7f7f7f7f, etc) look wrong to me, but I am
> worried I might be missing something?
>
Seems perfectly fine to me. This dates back to MIDI over serial line where
the mos
I haven’t actually looked at the code, so it’s possible we’re doing the
masking but not actually combining the bits into a single 14-bit value
properly still. I wouldn’t expect a simple mask value to accomplish that.
Evan
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 14:32 Evan Huus wrote:
> Based on the 0xxx of
Based on the 0xxx of your example and references like [1], I believe
the masks are correct. MIDI seems to mostly use seven bit bytes schmucked
together for some reason, so ignoring the high bit of each byte seems
correct to me.
Evan
[1] http://midi.teragonaudio.com/tech/midispec/wheel.htm
On
These mask fields (0x7f7f, 0x7f7f7f7f, etc) look wrong to me, but I am
worried I might be missing something?
Looking at an example in RFC 4695 (Song Position Pointer) I think this (on
page 157) is saying that is it just a 2-byte field (and should therefore
have a non-mask of 0x0)?
| Song Position
