Keith Fleming wrote:
> I looked in the format list under edit->prefrerences->columns but didn’t
> find any SCCP parameters. It would be nice to see not only the
> source/destination pointcodes as column headings, but the subsystem
> numbers as well. For other SS7 user parts, like ISUP, these c
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:25:33AM +0200, Peter Daum wrote:
> I just upgraded to wireshark 0.99.3.
>
> In older versions of ethereal, there used to be a section labeled
> SEQ/ACK analysis with links to the packet an ACK is referring to. Is
> there an option somewhere to get this information bac
On Oct 12, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Turner, Jay wrote:
> Sorry for my ignorance, but how do I use these mailing lists
> effectively? I can at least send messages (since this is here 8^)).
>
> 1. How do I properly reply to my message or another’s in my
> Inbox?
> a. If I use “Reply”, will
Your setup sounds fine and the ping requests are leaving the other
machines AND arriving at M1. However, M1 chooses not to reply. I don't
see any reason from a network perspective that this is happening. If
it's a Windows machine, have you tried reinstalling? :)
Steve
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:01:11PM +0100, David Ackie wrote:
> Filter icmp showed up icmp actions only ... I had no idea that saving
> that file saves everything not just icmp .. i.e the filter is not a
> hard filter .. It still has everything in it ...
When you go to File -> Save [As], you can
Hi,
You don't give a lot of info. Like What desktop (KDE, GNOME, MAC OSX,
Win32?), what OS (Solaris, Linux, BSD, WinME, Win2K (prof),
Win2k3 (Prof)(server), WinXP(prof) or even what version of Wireshark?
So how are we to answer the question.
Asuming defaults: it's probably a known bug, already fi
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:38:32AM -0500, Turner, Jay wrote:
> Sorry for my ignorance, but how do I use these mailing lists
> effectively? I can at least send messages (since this is here 8^)).
>
> 1. How do I properly reply to my message or another's in my Inbox?
> a. If I use "Reply", will the
I couldn't figure this out either
On 10/12/06, Turner, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sorry for my ignorance, but how do I use these mailing lists effectively? I
> can at least send messages (since this is here 8^)).
>
> 1. How do I properly reply to my message or another's in my Inb
Title: Using these mailing lists
Sorry for my ignorance, but how do I use these mailing lists effectively? I can at least send messages (since this is here 8^)).
1. How do I properly reply to my message or another’s in my Inbox?
a. If I use “Reply”, will the reply be added as the
Hi All,
Hi, I installed WireShark on my desktop but the application will not run.
There is no error message, nothing at all happens !! Anyone any ideas on
what may be preventing me from starting WireShark?
Thanks in advance.
_
Fin
Hi,
This points to PROTO_ID_UUID for which decoding was added in August:
r19064 | ulfl | 2006-08-28 23:12:44 +0200 (Mon, 28 Aug 2006) | 1 line
add some more right-hand-side infos of the tower data
---
Greetings all!!
I have been enjoying wireshark for a while now, and am still learning many
of its features. The latest one is the Expert info window,
reminiscent of the
old sniffer software.
Anyways, in reviewing a tracefile this past week, I can about a
statement within
the expert window that
I looked in the format list under
edit->prefrerences->columns but didn’t find any SCCP parameters. It
would be nice to see not only the source/destination pointcodes as column
headings, but the subsystem numbers as well. For other SS7 user parts, like
ISUP, these columns would be undefined.
Hi,
Are you connected to a switch? Probably yes.
That prevents any traffic (not just TCP, but all unicast) not destined for
the capture machine from being captured. That is the very nature of a
switch.
To solve this most switches let you define a monitor port which does get
to see this traffic.
T
What other TCP traffic do you expect??
Got a look at this: http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup ?
regards,
Lars
Tara Parker wrote:
> We try to run a capture, but are not seeing any TCP traffic. We can
> only see it if we browse the internet from the actual machine that
> Wireshark is loaded
We try to run a capture, but are not seeing any TCP traffic. We can
only see it if we browse the internet from the actual machine that
Wireshark is loaded on. We tried playing with the filters, but are
stumped. Can someone please help out a couple of newbies?
Thanks,
Tara
_
Yep I noticed that I done that the minute I sent it .. ( I hit the send
button after I constructed my reply but forgot to put the private address in
) I was just waiting for the avalanche of mail having a laugh at my expense
:-)) .. At least I made sure everything private was closed ...
Filter icmp
Hi guys, shall I spill the beans?
Or are we letting David find out for himself?
Nhaa, that's not nice. So here it goes.
David,
If you reply to a message from a mailing list and you want that reply to
be private, don't address the mailinglist.
Now that the message is sent, you already know it c
Janssens, Kitty wrote:
> The problem is that pclose returns 0 in either case.
> I've tried it with fork + execl too and there it's the same. The result
> of execl is a negative number whether wireshark has started correctly or
> not.
The result of execl() is a negative number only if the program
19 matches
Mail list logo
