On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:35 AM, klaas.holwerda wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Indeed if out commented, it works okay again.
> So recursive calls is not the problem it seems, only the assert.
> Don't know if the m_is_running is very important, but if yes or just handy
> to have, i think the up/down counte
Hi John,
Indeed if out commented, it works okay again.
So recursive calls is not the problem it seems, only the assert.
Don't know if the m_is_running is very important, but if yes or just handy to have, i think the
up/down counter would deal with the situation.
Regards,
Klaas
On 04/02/2014
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:11 PM, klaas.holwerda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recursive calls to RunBuffer() is a problem, gives an assert.
>
> int wxLuaState::RunBuffer(const char buf[], size_t size, const wxString
> &name, int nresults)
> {
> wxCHECK_MSG(Ok(), LUA_ERRRUN, wxT("Invalid wxLuaState"));
>
Hi,
Recursive calls to RunBuffer() is a problem, gives an assert.
int wxLuaState::RunBuffer(const char buf[], size_t size, const wxString &name,
int nresults)
{
wxCHECK_MSG(Ok(), LUA_ERRRUN, wxT("Invalid wxLuaState"));
wxCHECK_MSG(!M_WXLSTATEDATA->m_wxlStateData->m_is_running, LUA_ERRR
