Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of apt-get against each other

2015-01-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of apt-get against each other"): > On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 18:19 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I think target_run_apt ought to lose the $timeout parameter. Anyone > > who calls it with other than the big 3000s timeout mig

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of apt-get against each other

2015-01-21 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 18:19 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of > apt-get against each other"): > > Currently we rely on all apt-get invocations being in a single > > ts-xen-build-prep job which can't run on a shared host. > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of apt-get against each other

2015-01-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of apt-get against each other"): > Currently we rely on all apt-get invocations being in a single > ts-xen-build-prep job which can't run on a shared host. > > That is a bit inflexible so instead use our own lock. We wait >

[Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 01/18] apt: lock osstest's usages of apt-get against each other

2014-12-02 Thread Ian Campbell
Currently we rely on all apt-get invocations being in a single ts-xen-build-prep job which can't run on a shared host. That is a bit inflexible so instead use our own lock. We wait indefinitely and rely on osstest's existing command timeout infrastructure to catch problems. target_install_package