Hi,
On 24 January 2018 at 16:17, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 11:36 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>> So basically, just remove the “if
>> (RegionNotEmpty(DamageRegion(xwl_window->damage)))” would suffice?
>
> Worth a try anyway. I'm still just guessing at the root cause.
If it is
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 11:36 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> > So basically, just remove the “if
> > (RegionNotEmpty(DamageRegion(xwl_window->damage)))” would suffice?
>
> Worth a try anyway. I'm still just guessing at the root cause.
>
Ri
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 11:36 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> So basically, just remove the “if
> (RegionNotEmpty(DamageRegion(xwl_window->damage)))” would suffice?
Worth a try anyway. I'm still just guessing at the root cause.
- ajax
___
xorg-devel@lis
Hi Adam,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> Map / draw / unmap without hitting BlockHandler? I think
> xwl_unrealize_window() might be broken for that case:
>
> /* ... */
> wl_surface_destroy(xwl_window->surface);
> if (RegionNotEmpty(DamageRegion(xwl_window->da
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:15 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Ooh. serialNumber == 1 means it's the root pixmap, which will actually
> be uselessly empty. It would be interesting to see how we've ended up
> here: it would have to be a top-level window which a) was manually
> redirected by the WM when i
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Ooh. serialNumber == 1 means it's the root pixmap, which will actually
> be uselessly empty. It would be interesting to see how we've ended up
> here: it would have to be a top-level window which a) was manually
> redirected by t
Hi,
On 23 January 2018 at 09:42, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 19:57, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> That can't really be the problem. X drawables are never 0x0.
>
> Yeap, I don't know how we end with a pximap of size 0×0:
>
> [...]
> (gdb) f 7
> #7 xwl_glamor_pixmap_get_wl_buffer (pix
Hey Adam,
On 22 January 2018 at 19:57, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 11:41 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > This is a rare occurrence of a crash in Xwayland for which I don't have
> > the reproducing steps, just a core file.
> >
> > The backtrace looks as follow:
> >
> > [...]
>
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 11:41 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> This is a rare occurrence of a crash in Xwayland for which I don't have
> the reproducing steps, just a core file.
>
> The backtrace looks as follow:
>
> #0 raise () from /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
> #1 abort () from /usr/lib64/libc.so.6
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Odd; how could we have a realized 0x0 window which also has damage? I
>
Hehe, yeap, I had the same question, but didn't find the answer... :)
> wonder if this isn't actually a UAF where the xwl_window has since
> been unrealiz
Hi Olivier,
On 18 January 2018 at 10:41, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> This is a rare occurrence of a crash in Xwayland for which I don't have
> the reproducing steps, just a core file.
>
> The backtrace looks as follow:
>
> [...]
> #6
> #7 xwl_glamor_pixmap_get_wl_buffer () at xwayland-glamo
11 matches
Mail list logo
