[yocto] Yocto Bug Triage call for action

2011-05-26 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Hi All, The Yocto bug triage team did bug scrub and the following 2 bugs are identified as critical major which means they need to be fixed ASAP for the upcoming 1.1 M1 release. 1100 - [emenlow/crownbay-noemgd] X window could not start up with sato-sdk image (Tom, Dexuan, Darren) 1108 - k

[yocto] 1.1_M1.rc2 Reminder.

2011-05-26 Thread Elizabeth Flanagan
I will be ready to roll a second release candidate for M1 on Friday, May 27th at 7pm Pacific. If you have fixes for the 1.1_M1 branch for rc2, please be sure to call them out in your pull requests. Thanks. --- Elizabeth Flanagan Yocto Project Release Engineer _

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-sugarbay: Change build instructions in README to use BSP tarball

2011-05-26 Thread Stewart, David C
Thanks, Tom. :-) > -Original Message- > From: Zanussi, Tom > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:43 AM > To: Rifenbark, Scott M; Stewart, David C; yocto@yoctoproject.org > Cc: Zanussi, Tom > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] meta-sugarbay: Change build instructions in README to > use BSP tarball > > From:

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-sugarbay: Change build instructions in README to use BSP tarball

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Change the build instructions to use BSP tarballs instead of git clones. The git clone info remains as a mentioned alternative. Fixes [YOCTO #1103]. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- meta-sugarbay/README | 21 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deleti

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-sugarbay: Change README build instructions to prefer tarballs

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This changes the build instructions in the README for the Sugar Bay BSP to use tarballs instead of git clones. This fixes the issue reported for YOCTO 1103 at least as far as the README in the BSP for the Sugar Bay goes. The release notes on the Yocto website would still need

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-intel: fix BBFILE_COLLECTIONS overrides

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi Several BBFILE_COLLECTIONS assignments in the layer.confs for these meta-intel layers added unwanted machine overrides, resulting in truncated values for this variable - remove them. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- meta-crownbay/conf/layer.conf |4 ++-- meta-fishriver/

[yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta-intel BBFILE_COLLECTIONS fixups

2011-05-26 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi This fixes a problem with BBFILE_COLLECTIONS reported by Jeremy Puhlman. The following changes since commit 1b227f8ed2df529cc13f7169b0c08ff3d0f8c812: Tom Zanussi (1): meta-sugarbay: remove xserver-xf86-dri-lite bbappend are available in the git repository at: git:

Re: [yocto] In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf

2011-05-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:39 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > Using machine override has one small benefit > > when I have meta-nokia layer which has only recipes with > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "nokia900" and I'm building different machine (like > om-gta02) I get this warning: > WARNING: No bb files match

Re: [yocto] In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf

2011-05-26 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:37:45PM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:17 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote: > > Opps sent from wrong account. > > > > I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the values of > > BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are