On 02/09/2012 06:21 PM, Cherry, John wrote:
Hello Yocto developers,
Mentor Embedded (part of Mentor Graphics) recently announced the
availability of its new Embedded Linux Kit. This download is absolutely
free and available to anyone that would like to tinker with a prebuilt,
Check it out at
Hello Yocto developers,
Mentor Embedded (part of Mentor Graphics) recently announced the availability
of its new Embedded Linux Kit. This download is absolutely free and available
to anyone that would like to tinker with a prebuilt, Yocto-based image set for
both the BeagleBoard and the PandaB
On 02/06/2012 07:08 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:53 AM, David Nyström wrote:
On 02/04/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Garman wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to re-use the sstate from one build directory and move it to
another. It's not working - bitbake is rebuilding *everything*.
My hun
http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/02/09/yocto-project-quick-start-guide-for-ubuntu/
--
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project Community Manager @Intel http://yoctoproject.org
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yocto
Sorry for the late, somehow I thought I sent this out.
Attendees:
Saul, Darren, Dave, Beth, Josh, Richard, Scott, Tom, Paul, Belen, Michael,
Jeff, Matthew, Jessica, Sean, Song
Messages to the team:
1. Please complete your items and get them to patch review asap, do not wait
until the end of M
On 02/09/2012 07:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:51:11 Koen Kooi wrote:
The status ought to be correct with regard to the patch author's
assessment of whether or not the patch can go upstream.
That's where I disagree, it's called 'Upstream-status', not
'Perceived-up
On 02/09/2012 12:50 AM, cnxsoft wrote:
FYI. have done some further tests with the prebuilt binaries and
toolchain (yocto-eglibc-i686-i586-toolchain-gmae-1.0.tar.bz2,
bzImage-2.6.37-qemux86-1.0.bin and
yocto-image-minimal-dev-qemux86-1.0.rootfs.ext3).
With Ubuntu 11.10 (Virtual Box), it fails wit
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Joshua Immanuel wrote:
> Hello McClintock,
>
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:44 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote:
>> Did you consider taking this patch and adding it to the proper recipe?
>
> The patch is basically for boost.m4. We have the boost package in 'meta'
On Thursday 09 February 2012 15:51:11 Koen Kooi wrote:
> > The status ought to be correct with regard to the patch author's
> > assessment of whether or not the patch can go upstream.
>
> That's where I disagree, it's called 'Upstream-status', not
> 'Perceived-upstream-status'. The field should re
Op 9 feb. 2012, om 13:30 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
> On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:22:10 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> I find the 'pending' confusing, is it 'pending submission' or 'pending
>> approval'? I'm marking patches in meta-oe with 'Upstream-status: Unknown'
>> as default inste
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> I find the 'pending' confusing, is it 'pending submission' or 'pending
> approval'? I'm marking patches in meta-oe with 'Upstream-status: Unknown' as
> default instead of 'Pending' to make it a bit clearer. And patches marked
> 'inappropriate
Autif,
All good questions. I'm traveling right now and don't know the answers
off the top of my head. I'd try module_autoload and see if that does
what you want. I'll be back briefly next week and then off to ELC. I
should be able to assist next week though if you don't resolve this on
your own. I
On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:22:10 Koen Kooi wrote:
> I find the 'pending' confusing, is it 'pending submission' or 'pending
> approval'? I'm marking patches in meta-oe with 'Upstream-status: Unknown'
> as default instead of 'Pending' to make it a bit clearer. And patches
> marked 'inappropriate
Op 9 feb. 2012, om 00:18 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
> On 02/08/2012 01:26 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Saul Wold wrote:
>>
>>> If the author of curl would like to review and/or implement
>>> modification for OE that would be awesome, feel free to share the
>>>
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Saul Wold wrote:
If you can fix those issues, since we can't address all of them initially or
be experts in all upstreams, we would be very grateful to remove 1 or 2 more
patches.
Yes, I started looking into that.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
On 09/02/2012 10:15, Scott Garman wrote:
On 02/08/2012 07:11 PM, David Smoot wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012, at 8:18 AM, cnxsoft wrote:
On 08/02/2012 21:06, autif khan wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:14 AM, cnxsoft
wrote:
Hi,
.255.0 oprofile.timer=1 "
Enabling opengl
So, what is the problem?
16 matches
Mail list logo