[yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

If not set by user then let distro policy be to use linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk for linux-libc-headers-nativesdk Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/distro/fsl.conf |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/conf/distro/fsl.conf b/conf/distro/fsl.conf index 6d4dc34..8bfb272 100644

[yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 1/2] machines: Dont lock linux-libc-headers-nativesdk preferred provider

linux-libc-headers-nativesdk is for native bits in an SDK its not required to be locked in machine conf files since nothing depends on machine per se here. If its a mattetr of policy then this should be added to distro conf which in this layer is fsl.conf Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/machine

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Paul Eggleton >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:20 PM > >Templates are for starting new projects from scratch, as in the current hob >they are for starting new builds from scratch. Changes to a project's >c

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

On Thursday 05 July 2012 21:29:35 Zhang, Jessica wrote: > So firstly, in the design, any change to a project made by a user that > occurs while another user is also configuring a build on that same project > should be reflected in real-time in the other user's interface, and will be > accompanied b

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

Please see my comments/questions below... -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Paul Eggleton Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:01 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

[yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH] recipes: Bring bbappends in line with OE-Core/master

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-append/libxml/libxml2_2.7.8.bbappend |3 --- recipes-append/libxml/libxml2_2.8.0.bbappend |3 +++ recipes-append/netbase/netbase_4.47.bbappend | 10 -- recipes-append/netbase/netbase_5.0.bbappend | 10 ++ recipes-kernel/linux/linux-

Re: [yocto] yocto ref manual: app B.5 conflates BB_ENV_WHITELIST with BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE

On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > explanation in B.5 starts off talking about BB_ENV_WHITELIST, but > supplies an example referring to BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE. as a followup, it would seem that there should be a complete explanation of all of: * BB_PRESERVE_ENV * BB_ENV_WHITELIST

[yocto] yocto ref manual: app B.5 conflates BB_ENV_WHITELIST with BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE

explanation in B.5 starts off talking about BB_ENV_WHITELIST, but supplies an example referring to BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA

Re: [yocto] brief notes on current yocto reference manual

See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html for all corrections. Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 5:55 AM To: Yocto dis

Re: [yocto] poky/yocto ref manual gives wrong PATH location for "bitbake"

I corrected this section. See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html#structure-core-bitbake Thanks, Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Wednesday

[yocto] [PATCH 1/1] run-postinsts does not run any scripts

Hi Sorry for any mistakes, but this is my first patch... On my system (core-image-base, .deb package files), run-postinsts does not run any scripts due to a failed test in run-postinsts.awk. As dpkg is not actually installed on target, opkg is identified as the pkgdir and that is not right... I

[yocto] brief notes on current yocto reference manual

(i suspect scott has already gotten to some of these but here's the list i've got so far.) * 2.3.3: refers to generated .dot files "depends.dot" and "task-depends.dot". in my build, i got three files: * pn-depends.dot * package-depends.dot * task-depends.dot A.1.1: The "bitbake" execu

Re: [yocto] where should i make observations about poky reference manual?

On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 05 July 2012 12:31:01 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > > I would suggest putting them up on the list here Robert. I don't believe > > anyone is maintaining the Poky Reference Manual. Any oddities, comments, > > or corrections to the YP docs thoug

Re: [yocto] where should i make observations about poky reference manual?

On Thursday 05 July 2012 12:31:01 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > I would suggest putting them up on the list here Robert. I don't believe > anyone is maintaining the Poky Reference Manual. Any oddities, comments, > or corrections to the YP docs though post to this list. I presume Robert is referrin

Re: [yocto] where should i make observations about poky reference manual?

I would suggest putting them up on the list here Robert. I don't believe anyone is maintaining the Poky Reference Manual. Any oddities, comments, or corrections to the YP docs though post to this list. Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...

[yocto] where should i make observations about poky reference manual?

frantically writing courseware at the moment so little time to create and submit actual patches, but if i run across oddities in any of the current "yocto" docs, should i simply post them here and let others hash over them and decide what to do about them? i offered to send them offline to sc

Re: [yocto] Some questions about the webhob design

On Tuesday 03 July 2012 12:10:57 Xu, Dongxiao wrote: > Today Jessica and PRC team had a discussion of the webhob tasks listed in > the wiki page, and about the "Group" and "Project" concept, we still have > some questions. Let's be clear though from the below, we're talking about projects only.