Re: [yocto] ERROR: Function failed: do_rootfs, poky commit id 8ce23f569584f195391bc5c68a780e1bf54e4360

2012-10-22 Thread Elvis Dowson
Hi, On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:22 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > | Configuring sysvinit. > | Collected errors: > | * preinst_configure: Aborting installation of base-passwd. > | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package packagegroup-core-boot. > | ERROR: Function failed: do_rootfs (see > /tool/

[yocto] Agenda: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, October 23, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

2012-10-22 Thread Liu, Song
Agenda:   * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * Yocto 1.3 release readiness - 20 min (Song/team) https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.3_Status#Milestone_5_.281.3_release.29 * SWAT team rotation: Saul -> Nitin * Opens - 10 min * Team Sharing - 20 min   -Original Appointment

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/3] [meta-intel] meta-intel/common:Add a new recipe for Zlib qat_mem Module.

2012-10-22 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 23:03 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 22:15 -0500, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Zanussi, Tom > > >Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 11:49 AM > > >To: Bodke, Kishore K > > >Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; yocto@yoctoproject.org > >

Re: [yocto] AUTOREV problems

2012-10-22 Thread Jerrod Peach
Correction: I'm wrong on the standard for PV. The standard (after looking through some BB files) appears to be this: PV = "+${SRCPV}" On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerrod Peach wrote: > Seth, > > Like Tomas said, it's hard to say for sure without seeing the recipe in > question, but I know

Re: [yocto] AUTOREV problems

2012-10-22 Thread Jerrod Peach
Seth, Like Tomas said, it's hard to say for sure without seeing the recipe in question, but I know one way this could happen: AUTOREV, by itself, does not permute your hash. It ends up just resolving to the string "AUTOINC" every time. You *also *need the SRCPV variable somewhere in your recipe,

Re: [yocto] AUTOREV problems

2012-10-22 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Hi, On 22/10/12 12:56, Seth Bollinger wrote: > 1. What is the expected operation of bitbake builds for recipes using > autorev? It should just work (and FWIW, it's working here). > 2. How can I get my autorev recipes to rebuild when their repositories > change? > 3. If this is working for eve

[yocto] AUTOREV problems

2012-10-22 Thread Seth Bollinger
Hello All, I've been having some serious problems trying to get my image to rebuild recipes when their upstream repositories have changed. I have SRCREV = ${AUTOREV} in my recipe and in bitbake -e I see these 2 lines: # SRCREV=${AUTOREV} SRCREV="AUTOINC" I've found BB_SRCREV_POLICY and I've set

Re: [yocto] Cedar Trail and gst-vaapi fixes

2012-10-22 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 October 2012 21:08, Tom Zanussi wrote: > I pulled the first two patches into meta-intel/master, but left the > third behind - we still need the commercial license since the > gst-ffmpeg requires it, and even then we still want to keep the > VA_FEATURES so users can just set it to "" to not i

[yocto] [PATCH] meta-intel: don't require commercial licenses for gstreamer-vaapi

2012-10-22 Thread Ross Burton
Now that gstreamer-vaapi doesn't depend on ffmpeg, it can always be recommended by the machine configuration. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton --- meta-cedartrail/conf/machine/cedartrail.conf |3 +-- meta-chiefriver/conf/machine/chiefriver.conf |3 +-- meta-crownbay/conf/machine/crownbay.conf

Re: [yocto] why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out?

2012-10-22 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 22 October 2012 09:06:41 Tomas Frydrych wrote: > On 20/10/12 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote: > > Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta- > > guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers. > >

Re: [yocto] why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out?

2012-10-22 Thread Tomas Frydrych
On 20/10/12 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote: > Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta- > guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers. Ah, so there is an official community and an unoffical one, this com

Re: [yocto] why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out?

2012-10-22 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Hi Saul On 19/10/12 19:01, Saul Wold wrote: > My apologies, I updated the MAINTAINER and README files. Thanks. >> (I am delighted Intel is finding Guacamayo useful, but the obliteration >> of the history makes it look as if the credit for this official Yocto >> layer goes to Intel; I am sure tha