Re: [yocto] Preempt-rt kernel build for beagleboard

Hi Bruce, Thanks for commenting :-) You shouldn't have needed to do this part, since the board already has > a preempt-rt BSP description: > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/**cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-3.4/** > tree/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/**bsp/beagleboard/beagleboard-** > preempt-rt.scc?h=meta

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

This issue has been entered into the yocto bugzilla as: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3503 ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/3] Initialize bitbake session & environment parse variables

Hi Ioana, The patched won't apply and please rebase against eclipse-poky-windows and resubmit. Thanks, Jessica -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Ioana Grigoropol Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:05 AM To: yoct

[yocto] Minutes: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting - Tuesday, November 27, 2012 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Attendees: Dave, MichaelH, Ciby, PaulE, ScottG, BjörnS, Ramana, KevinS, TomZ, Eren, AlexG, ALexD, Richard, BrianR,Jefro, LaurentiuP, Nitin, BruceA, RossB, ScottR, JeffP, MarkH, CristianI, DarrenH, DaveST, JessicaZ, Beth, Song, IoanaG.   Agenda:   * Opens collection - 5 min (Song) * Yocto 1.4 stat

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > and ran the fetchall again. this time, no strace source was fetched, > > so it looks like an issue with simple fetching. > > Thank you for your testing and observations. > > But I'd like

Re: [yocto] Wiki Main page terrible sparse

Hi Jeff, >Hi Maxin - it would be good to coordinate your effort with the rest of the >community. Sure :) >Can you let us know what you have in mind before starting? At first, I will try to address the suggestions of Alex along with other modifications based on our requirements. >Also, ple

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > and ran the fetchall again. this time, no strace source was fetched, > > so it looks like an issue with simple fetching. > > Thank you for your testing and observations. > > But I'd like

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

Le Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:24:06 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day" a écrit : > and ran the fetchall again. this time, no strace source was fetched, > so it looks like an issue with simple fetching. > It's not fetched because the build system fails to see the new package as a dependencie of the image s

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > and ran the fetchall again. this time, no strace source was fetched, > so it looks like an issue with simple fetching. Thank you for your testing and observations. But I'd like to point out that in my tests, all the relevant files hav

Re: [yocto] [oe] patchwork support for meta-freescale

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could patchwork support be added to meta-freescale? It'd allow for >> easy handle of patches. > > Ping? These are hosted on different organizations... I don't see any

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Eren Türkay wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:40:26AM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > Thank you, Eric, for the confirmation. > > > > Just to clarify for anyone following along: the problem isn't with > > bash or trace-cmd themselves. If I perform the same steps but use > >

Re: [yocto] Need for offline binary configuration

Looking for comments. Thanks From: Bruce Ashfield [bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 12:59 AM To: Venkata ramana gollamudi Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Sanil kumar; Hatle, Mark; 'dvh...@linux.intel.com' Subject: Re: [yocto] Need

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:40:26AM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Thank you, Eric, for the confirmation. > > Just to clarify for anyone following along: the problem isn't with > bash or trace-cmd themselves. If I perform the same steps but use > 'bash' first, then 'trace-cmd', adding 'bash' succee

[yocto] [PATCH 4/4] Do not rely on AbstractHostShellOutputReader for waiting for command outputs

- AbstractHostShellReader is designed such that it will block in a read from the pipeline when the command is finished its execution, therefore we should not wait for this variable to be set because it will eventually block. Instead we will acquire a semaphore each time we run a command and wait

[yocto] [PATCH 3/4] Fix bitbake session by disabling sanity checks

- when creating a shell session for Bitbake, we cannot run "bitbake -e -b recipe.bb" just by setting DISABLE_SANITY_CHECKS=1; we must first append DISABLE_SANITY_CHECKS to BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol --- .../src/org/yocto/bc/bitbake/BBRecipe.java | 10 +

[yocto] [PATCH 2/4] Fix md5sum & sha256sum pattern checks

Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol --- .../ui/wizards/NewBitBakeFileRecipeWizardPage.java |5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/org.yocto.bc.ui/src/org/yocto/bc/ui/wizards/NewBitBakeFileRecipeWizardPage.java b/plugins/org.yocto.bc.ui/src/org/yocto/bc/

[yocto] [PATCH 1/4] Fix remote deletion of files

- when deleting a file from a remote directory use the URI and not the location of the file which is null Signed-off-by: Ioana Grigoropol --- .../src/org/yocto/bc/bitbake/BBSession.java|6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/org.yocto.bc.ui/s

Re: [yocto] Preempt-rt kernel build for beagleboard

On 12-11-27 05:23 AM, Yu Pan wrote: I started looking at Yocto 2 weeks back. Despite the complexity in kernel building, I found it quite hard to locate information on preempt-rt build. I was trying to build linux-yocto-rt for beagleboard from "danny" and the linux-yocto-3.4 kernel, and it seems t

Re: [yocto] Forcing native binaries to build as 32-bit on a 64-bit host OS?

On Tuesday 20 November 2012 14:27:30 Jerrod Peach wrote: > My company has traditionally built all their code on 32-bit systems for > 32-bit target architectures. We're now trying to move our build hosts to > 64-bit OSes, but that's presenting us with a bit of a problem: some > non-trivial number o

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

Le Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:00:34 +, Jonas Jonsson L a écrit : > I can also confirm this. > > A package (I've tried with diffutils & bash) must be built separately before > it's added to an image via IMAGE_INSTALL_append. > that seems to work the first time you add something using IMAGE_INSTALL

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

I can also confirm this. A package (I've tried with diffutils & bash) must be built separately before it's added to an image via IMAGE_INSTALL_append. /Jonas - fetched poky today -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf O

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: > I confirm the problem when following this procedure step by step. Thank you, Eric, for the confirmation. Just to clarify for anyone following along: the problem isn't with bash or trace-cmd themselves. If I perform the same steps but use 'ba

Re: [yocto] IMAGE_INSTALL_append workflow

Hi Trevor, Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:20:30 -0500, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > I haven't yet figured out if the "PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = > > "linux-yocto-rt"" line might be the culprit. > > No, it is not related, this problem do

[yocto] Preempt-rt kernel build for beagleboard

I started looking at Yocto 2 weeks back. Despite the complexity in kernel building, I found it quite hard to locate information on preempt-rt build. I was trying to build linux-yocto-rt for beagleboard from "danny" and the linux-yocto-3.4 kernel, and it seems to be working. I'd like to share how on

Re: [yocto] does meta-intel/meta-tlk layer require a README.sources file?

On 26 November 2012 20:44, Tom Zanussi wrote: > The meta-tlk layer isn't a BSP layer - it's a layer used to add the > 'time limited kernel' feature to images built from a meta-intel BSP > layer and distributed with that layer e.g. in the downloadable tarballs > available on the Yocto downloads pag

Re: [yocto] Best way to support multiple versions of Poky?

* Burton, Ross [121126 14:58]: > On 26 November 2012 13:55, Jerrod Peach wrote: > > build-bundle (git repo with our layers + tools) > > | > > +-- meta-ourstuff (git submodule, i.e. separate repo locked to a specific > > version within build-bundle) > > +-- poky (another submodule) > >| > >