Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Daniel Lazzari
> On 2013-03-07 8:11, Jerrod Peach wrote: > > Hans, > > > > Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead of $S > > as the root for patching? I've had to do a lot of patching in our own > > layers recently and I've always seen $S used as the root for the > > patch. Are you expl

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-07 5:02 PM, Insop Song wrote: One observation and question: 1. I can build core-image-minimal/sato with meta-dl (with github 3.8 or yocto-3.8 kernel) with yocto on "danny-8.0" tag 2. I cannot build a successfully bootable core-image-minimal (with meta-dl) with yocto on "1.4_M4" tag, the

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-07 4:49 PM, Insop Song wrote: Thanks Juri, I was going to add you to my linux-yocto-3.8 announcement email and due to some last minute debug activities .. it slipped my mind. So I'm using this thread to let you, and anyone else that is interested know that sched_deadline support is avai

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-07 4:43 PM, Insop Song wrote: Hi Bruce, What do you have in your "defconfig" ? I'm about to push patches that will make enabling sched_dealine a KERNEL_FEATURE option, which makes it even easier to use. Here is my defconfg https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/blob/sched-dl-V7/recipes-k

Re: [yocto] [eclipse-poky][PATCHv3 0/6] Refactorings in org.yocto.sdk.ide plugin

2013-03-07 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Merged to eclipse-poky master. Thanks for the contribution. Cheers, Jessica -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Atanas Gegov Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 6:09 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: [yocto] [eclip

Re: [yocto] Samba server?

2013-03-07 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com] > > > > No, adding extra layer is pretty basic operation and should > > be properly > > documented. Can you send some pointers what have you read > > about adding a > > layer

Re: [yocto] Samba server?

2013-03-07 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
> From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com] > > No, adding extra layer is pretty basic operation and should > be properly > documented. Can you send some pointers what have you read > about adding a > layer and what wasn't easy to understand? How to theoretically add a layer was easy

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Insop Song
One observation and question: 1. I can build core-image-minimal/sato with meta-dl (with github 3.8 or yocto-3.8 kernel) with yocto on "danny-8.0" tag 2. I cannot build a successfully bootable core-image-minimal (with meta-dl) with yocto on "1.4_M4" tag, the image was stuck during booting.. My bui

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Insop Song
> > Thanks Juri, I was going to add you to my linux-yocto-3.8 announcement > email and due to some last minute debug activities .. it slipped my > mind. So I'm using this thread to let you, and anyone else that is > interested know that sched_deadline support is available to try out > in linux-yoct

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Insop Song
Hi Bruce, > What do you have in your "defconfig" ? I'm about to push patches that > will make enabling sched_dealine a KERNEL_FEATURE option, which makes > it even easier to use. > Here is my defconfg https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/blob/sched-dl-V7/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/defconfig I've as

Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Hans Beckerus
On 2013-03-07 10:01, Jerrod Peach wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Hans Beckerus > wrote: On 2013-03-07 8:11, Jerrod Peach wrote: Hans, Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead of $S as the root for patching? I'

[yocto] Yocto Project 1.4 milestone 4 released

2013-03-07 Thread Michael Halstead
Yocto Project 1.4 milestone 4 is ready. Kernel.org mirrors will be present shortly. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The fourth milestone for the upcoming Yocto Project 1.4 release is now available at: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/milestones/yocto-1.4-m4/pok

Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Jerrod Peach
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote: > On 2013-03-07 8:11, Jerrod Peach wrote: > > Hans, > > Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead of $S > as the root for patching? I've had to do a lot of patching in our own > layers recently and I've always seen $S u

[yocto] Problem with Xserver freezing

2013-03-07 Thread Satya Swaroop Damarla
Hi Guys, I created a X11 image and I found that the init is freezing. Advice regarding configuring Xorg is very much appreciated. If I remove Xinitialization from init then its properly starting. my board is a specialized version of Nvidia Tegra Harmony board. Current version of pixman: 0.29.2

Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Hans Beckerus
On 2013-03-07 8:11, Jerrod Peach wrote: Hans, Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead of $S as the root for patching? I've had to do a lot of patching in our own layers recently and I've always seen $S used as the root for the patch. Are you explicitly setting S = "

Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Jerrod Peach
Hans, Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead of $S as the root for patching? I've had to do a lot of patching in our own layers recently and I've always seen $S used as the root for the patch. Are you explicitly setting S = "${WORKDIR}/git"? That's what we do for our g

[yocto] PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot problem

2013-03-07 Thread Hans Beckérus
Hi, in my BSP machine/conf I have the following: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-xlnx" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot = "u-boot-xlnx" I also have a linux-xlnx.bb and a u-boot-xlnx.bb in meta/mybsp/recipes_kernel and recipes_bsp respectively. When I do 'bitbake virtual/kernel', the correct .

Re: [yocto] Samba server?

2013-03-07 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:22:54AM -0800, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > Or maybe I should just build the system without samba, run it, manually > install samba just like any other user, and then use dd to save the modified > image for production use. Does that sound like a good idea? No, adding extra l

Re: [yocto] Samba server?

2013-03-07 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
> From: Martin Jansa > > Are you talking about openembedded as openembedded-classic or > meta-openembedded? > > Use samba from meta-openembedded. That's what I tried first. It's not a layer, but a collection of layers, and the layer that contains samba is called meta-oe. So I tried to include me

Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 07 March 2013 13:12:57 Hans Beckérus wrote: > I have a patch file that needs to be applied to a source tree and the > patch file is copied properly to the ${WORKDIR} directory. > So far so good. But, the problem with this source tree is that it is > not built from the traditional root f

Re: [yocto] Patching gcc-4.7.2 to add support for Xilinx MicroBlaze

2013-03-07 Thread Elvis Dowson
Hi Khem, Any plans on moving to gcc-4.7.3 or 4.8.0 anytime soon? Nearly all the microblaze gcc patches are for gcc-4.8.0 on the trunk, several of them in fact. I've re-applied and ported all the existing patches that you've created for gcc-4.7.2 to gcc-4.7.3 (not yet tested).

Re: [yocto] Hob terminal is getting terminated

2013-03-07 Thread varun bhatnagar
Hi, I tried putting the tar files in the "download" folder but that did not work. I tried extracting the files too. But no luck :( What shall I do to make this work...??? On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > I don't see any reason this conversation can't be on the public

Re: [yocto] Trying to bitbake core-image-minimal on Archlinux

2013-03-07 Thread Biao
在 2013-03-04 06:16:55,"Jack Mitchell" 写道: On 03/03/13 18:02, Ismael Barros² wrote: Hi there, I'm new to Yocto, and I keep finding errors that prevent me from building a minimal image. I've just installed poky-danny-8.0, sourced oe-init-build-env, and bitbaked core-image-minimal. The

[yocto] Full Pass Test Report for Yocto 1.3.1 RC1 201302262 Build

2013-03-07 Thread Stoicescu, CorneliuX
From: Stoicescu, CorneliuX Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:48 AM To: yocto Subject: Weekly Test Report for Yocto 1.4 20130213 Build Hello, Here is this the report for the 1.3.1 RC1 danny build: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Full_Pass_Test_Report_for_Yocto_1.3.1_RC1_201302262_Build NO

[yocto] "trap: 80: SIGHUP: bad trap" comes up when building core-image-sato.

2013-03-07 Thread Biao
= "qemux86-64" DISTRO = "poky" DISTRO_VERSION= "1.3+snapshot-20130307" TUNE_FEATURES = "m64" TARGET_FPU= "" meta meta-yocto meta-yocto-bsp= "danny-8.0:6663b79452bcdd95fc69e1ec853baae6c5297ab2&

Re: [yocto] Question about file systems

2013-03-07 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, Mar 5 2013 at 08:20 -0800, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > So I guess the questions are these: Are ext2, ext3 and ext4 all equally > likely to need to do an "fsck" after a disorderly shutdown? Do they > typically take different amounts of time to do an "fsck"? Or is the > journaling of ext3 and ex

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Juri Lelli
Hi, On 03/06/2013 08:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote: Hi, I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-dl". I am planning to add scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well. - http://inso

Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:28:25 Rudolf Streif wrote: > What are you exactly referring to as "new version"? The package version > that bitbake builds is defined by the recipe, through the version > designation in the recipe's file name or through explicitly setting PV. > > I think what you are

[yocto] [PATCHv3 6/6] Performed a whitespaces cleanup

2013-03-07 Thread Atanas Gegov
From: Atanas Gegov While moving these files into new packages it turned out that there is a need of whitespaces cleanup. --- .../sdk/ide/natures/YoctoSDKProjectNature.java |2 +- .../src/org/yocto/sdk/ide/utils/YoctoSDKUtils.java | 102 ++-- 2 files changed, 52 insertion

[yocto] [PATCHv3 5/6] Export the new subpackages of org.yocto.sdk.ide

2013-03-07 Thread Atanas Gegov
From: Atanas Gegov --- plugins/org.yocto.sdk.ide/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/plugins/org.yocto.sdk.ide/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF b/plugins/org.yocto.sdk.ide/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF index b09abb3..0bdaa85 100644 --- a/plugins/org.yocto.sdk.ide/META-INF/M

[yocto] [PATCHv3 4/6] Moved nature-related utils in own class

2013-03-07 Thread Atanas Gegov
From: Atanas Gegov Created a nature specific utils class and moved a method that is only relevant in the natures context. --- .../ide/natures/YoctoSDKEmptyProjectNature.java|3 +- .../yocto/sdk/ide/natures/YoctoSDKNatureUtils.java | 39 .../sdk/ide/natures/YoctoSDK

[yocto] [PATCHv3 2/6] Moved functionality that does not belong to YoctoSDKProjectNature

2013-03-07 Thread Atanas Gegov
From: Atanas Gegov This functionality is not directly connected to the YoctoSDKProjectNature itself. Moreover, it might also be used by other natures. Made a lot of constants private as they are used only locally. Globally used constants are moved in an own class. --- .../src/org/yocto/sdk/ide/Y

[yocto] [PATCHv3 1/6] Moved YoctoSDK natures to their own package

2013-03-07 Thread Atanas Gegov
From: Atanas Gegov If further natures are added, they will fit into this package and not overpopulate the org.yocto.sdk.ide package. --- plugins/org.yocto.sdk.ide/plugin.xml |4 +- .../src/org/yocto/sdk/ide/YoctoSDKChecker.java |2 + .../yocto/sdk/ide/YoctoSDKEmptyProje

[yocto] [eclipse-poky][PATCHv3 0/6] Refactorings in org.yocto.sdk.ide plugin

2013-03-07 Thread Atanas Gegov
From: Atanas Gegov Hi, Currently the org.yocto.sdk.ide plugin has the YoctoSDKEmptyProjectNature and the YoctoSDKProjectNature. The latter is strongly coupled with the Autotools nature since this is by now the only supported build system. It would be nice if it is possible to introduce other Yo

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-07 12:05 AM, Insop Song wrote: Bruce, That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl. (https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8) The purposes of meta-dl are the following three: 1. easy to use sched_deadline by providing recipes-kernel that includes - git

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-07 03:26 AM, Insop Song wrote: Hi Bruce, One more question on 3.8 kernel. Is "meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.8.bb" added soon as well in 1.4? It's in master as of a few days ago. So it's available and ready for use. Cheers, Bruce I am using 1.4_M4.final now. Thank you.

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-07 12:05 AM, Insop Song wrote: Bruce, That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl. (https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8) I have another suggestion to offer here, one I've been wanting to do for a bit. I've added Darren Hart to the thread, since

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-06 11:24 PM, Juri Lelli wrote: Hi, On 03/06/2013 08:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote: Hi, I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-dl". I am planning to add scheduler testing tools and differe

Re: [yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Hans Beckérus
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Hans Beckérus wrote: > Hi. More problems ;) > I have a patch file that needs to be applied to a source tree and the > patch file is copied properly to the ${WORKDIR} directory. > So far so good. But, the problem with this source tree is that it is > not built from t

[yocto] Problem with applying a patch using default -pnum

2013-03-07 Thread Hans Beckérus
Hi. More problems ;) I have a patch file that needs to be applied to a source tree and the patch file is copied properly to the ${WORKDIR} directory. So far so good. But, the problem with this source tree is that it is not built from the traditional root folder of the repo. This means I need to cha

Re: [yocto] nested meta layers, how can/should it be done?

2013-03-07 Thread Insop Song
Hi, I am not an expert yet, but here is what I've recently done and I think this will give you some hints to what you want to achieve. I've made a new meta layer so that I can use custom kernel and add new programs on top of existing core-image-* targets. I used qemu targets for now, but I also p

[yocto] Problem editing reference image(s) in Hob

2013-03-07 Thread Andreas Enbacka
Hello, When trying to edit a reference image in the Hob interface (by e.g., selecting core-image-basic, and then Edit Image) I end up with the error message 'Nothing PROVIDES libgstapp-0.10' each time when trying to build the image). In the Edit Image phase I select the desired packages that I

Re: [yocto] Samba server?

2013-03-07 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 03:31:03PM -0800, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > The poky-danny-8.0 tree doesn't seem to have any Samba stuff in it. However, > openembedded does. My untutored, fumbling efforts to include the relevant > part of the latter in the former haven't succeeded. Is there an easy way to >

[yocto] nested meta layers, how can/should it be done?

2013-03-07 Thread Hans Beckérus
Hi. I wish to write a custom meta layer that should add on-top of an existing bsp for eg. kernel and u-boot builds. But I want the custom layer to use .bbappend for some standard packages and also add some custom packages. My guess is that it might cause problems for the standard packages (since th

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Insop Song
Hi Bruce, One more question on 3.8 kernel. Is "meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.8.bb" added soon as well in 1.4? I am using 1.4_M4.final now. Thank you. Insop On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Insop Song wrote: > Bruce, > > That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Insop Song
Bruce, That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl. (https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8) The purposes of meta-dl are the following three: 1. easy to use sched_deadline by providing recipes-kernel that includes - git url including github and from yocto-kerne

Re: [yocto] A question on adding a new program to a new meta layer

2013-03-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote: Hi, I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a sched_deadline scheduler, called "meta-dl". I am planning to add scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well. - http://insop.github.com/meta-dl/ FYI: I've already merged and