Agenda:
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto 1.5 status - 10 min (Song/team)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.5_Status
* Yocto Project 1.5 QA plan review - 20 min (AlexG/MihaiL)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/1.5_Overall_Test_Plan
* SWAT team rotation: Radu M -> Con
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02000
I think the name is meta-yocto-kernel-extras. That is what I have pushed to
the docs.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Hart, Darren
>Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:28 AM
>To: Richard Purdie
>Cc: Michael Halstead; Bruce Ashfield; Rifenbark, Scott M; yocto;
>Zanussi, Tom
>Subject: Re:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 07:46 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 23:18 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > On 06/30/2013 10:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:33 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> > > > I can change the name shortly. Is there any reason to keep a
On 1 July 2013 02:37, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> I got a hold of Saul and confirmed that you are right. I have been entering
> these strings incorrectly for a good while now. I have applied your patch to
> the tip of the yocto-docs repository and republished in our development area
> for the
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 30 June 2013 23:40, Flanagan, Elizabeth
> wrote:
>> This weekend I brought down the autobuilder to implement the new build
>> failure email formatter. This *should* provide a bit more detailed
>> information in a much easier to read format
On 1 July 2013 15:28, Edward Vidal wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Burton, Ross
> Date: Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [yocto] Fedora 18 CentOS 6.4 yocto difference
> To: Edward Vidal
>
>
> On 1 July 2013 14:45, Edward Vidal wrote:
>> Ross,
>> I am attachi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Burton, Ross
Date: Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [yocto] Fedora 18 CentOS 6.4 yocto difference
To: Edward Vidal
On 1 July 2013 14:45, Edward Vidal wrote:
> Ross,
> I am attaching the recent file. I had to re-run the command since I have
On Jul 1, 2013, at 2:16 AM, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 15:44 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> On 2013-06-27 04:06, Ross Burton wrote:
>>> The meta-toolchain* recipes are deprecated, so when building
>>> meta-toolchain-gmae
>>> also build the SDK for core-image-sato.
>>>
>>> Signed-
On 1 July 2013 14:16, Edward Vidal wrote:
> /usr/bin/gfortran -Wall -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed
> build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.o
> build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/python_xerbla.o -L/usr/lib64
> -L/home/vidal/POKY/build062913_dylan/poky/build/
-- Forwarded message --
From: Edward Vidal
Date: Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [yocto] Fedora 18 CentOS 6.4 yocto difference
To: "Burton, Ross"
/usr/bin/gfortran -Wall -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed
build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/lapack_litemod
On 1 July 2013 13:37, Edward Vidal wrote:
> This is the error that I get.
> | /usr/bin/gfortran -Wall -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed
> build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/lapack_litemodule.o
> build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/numpy/linalg/python_xerbla.o -L/usr/lib64
> -L/home/vidal/
Hello,
I build images for beagleboard, pandaboard, and beaglebone. The base
core-image-sato-sdk with the additonal
boost qt-mobility-x11 gsl gnuplot gnuradio
openjdk-7-jdk openjdk-7-jre openjdk-7-vm-jamvm openjdk-7-vm-cacao
python-netserver
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= "1.18.0"
BUILD_
On Sunday 30 June 2013 00:05:58 varun bhatnagar wrote:
> Yes Paul that was the entry was there in CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. I have
> removed it from there but I need to add the command provided by these
> packages in my image. So I have added one line in my layer.conf file
> "IMAGE_INSTALL_append=
On 1 July 2013 10:24, Kumita Bruce wrote:
> What's the reason to deprecate meta-toolchain that is for standalone
> cross-compiler generation? Is there a replacement?
For full SDKs, generation from images is trivial now and means you
don't need to replicate everything. I've no idea about the prod
What's the reason to deprecate meta-toolchain that is for standalone
cross-compiler generation? Is there a replacement?
Cheers,
Bruce
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 15:44 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On 2013-06-27 04:06, Ross Burton wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 15:44 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-06-27 04:06, Ross Burton wrote:
> > The meta-toolchain* recipes are deprecated, so when building
> > meta-toolchain-gmae
> > also build the SDK for core-image-sato.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
>
> If/when the meta-toolchain r
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> as an aside, if meta-toolchain is deprecated why should we carry
> meta-toolchain-gmae as well? it seems a special SDK
> only target. I think it will be better to have sdks from images all
> the time.
Because the QA testing for Danny and likely
On 30 June 2013 23:40, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> This weekend I brought down the autobuilder to implement the new build
> failure email formatter. This *should* provide a bit more detailed
> information in a much easier to read format. Please, let me know of
> any tweaks people might like to se
19 matches
Mail list logo
