? ^
compilation terminated.
Thanks in advance,
?Edward Vidal Jr. e-mail devel...@sbcglobal.net 915-595-1613
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20161209/6
I tried a few other things, see below.
> -Original Message-
> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Evenson
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 2:50 PM
> To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: [yocto] Can't enable reverse debuggin
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield
>> mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
>>
>>
Thanks. I try to get this merged soon.
--Mark
On 12/9/16 11:34 AM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> The ifunc1, ifunc2, and ifunc3 tests currently fail on x86_64 x32 ABI
> because the testcase crashes at runtime. The testcases run fine when not
> prelinked.
>
> In the case of ifunc1, the
On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
Hi list
I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
>
>> Hi list
>>
>> I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm
>> layer for the kernel.
>> In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patc
On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote:
On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
Hi list
I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the
Hi Patrick,
On 09/12/2016 16:13, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Thanks for contributing directly to the page. It's great to see this
> done collaboratively.
>
> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 23:38 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Philip,
>>
>> On 06/12/2016 19:45, Philip Balister wrote:
>>>
Hello everyone!
Thanks for contributing directly to the page. It's great to see this
done collaboratively.
On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 23:38 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> On 06/12/2016 19:45, Philip Balister wrote:
> > On 12/06/2016 06:11 AM, Lopez, Mariano wrote:
> >> I agree with you,
On 2016-12-09 02:25 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
On 12/08/2016 05:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote:
Hi list
I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm
layer for the kernel.
In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe c
Hi
Trying to add fortran to 6.2.0 branch morty for a Raspberrypi2
Step 1 modified meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-6.2.inc
-FORTRAN = ""
+FORTRAN = ",fortran"
bitbake core-image-sato created the image
Testing on target. I see fortran in the command gcc -v.
gcc -v --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
On 9 December 2016 at 13:04, Alankar Dhobale <
alankar.dhob...@renuelectronics.com> wrote:
> But I think “make” is somehow calling g++ instead of calling
> arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-g++. I am not sure about the generated sdk is
> correct?
>
>
I'd check the generated makefiles, or your qmake files. A
Hello Ross,
Thanks for your reply, but I did not get you, I actually sourced the setup
script for the sdk toolchain installed at path /opt/poky/2.1.1/…
But I think “make” is somehow calling g++ instead of calling
arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-g++. I am not sure about the generated sdk is correct
As per the documentation, the compiler isn't just "gcc" but has the full
platform triple in:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.1/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html#makefile-based-projects
One you've sourced the setup script these are set as $CC and so on, so your
makefile should be using $CC instead of
2016-12-09 10:05 GMT+01:00 Paul Barker :
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:00:19 +0100
> Mirza Krak wrote:
>
>> From: Mirza Krak
>>
>> U-boot has been updated to 2016.11 in OE-core Which means that we can
>> use the upstream patches instead of the backports and no need for the third
>> patch which causes
From: Mirza Krak
The patch 0003-Include-lowlevel_init.o-for-rpi2.patch does not apply on
2016.11 and causes an build error.
Patch 0002-rpi-passthrough-of-the-firmware-provided-FDT-blob.patch
provides the inclusion of lowlever_init.o.
Signed-off-by: Mirza Krak
---
Changes in V2:
- droped chang
Hello again.
I tried to fix this in my layers by adding a
"recipes-devtools/gcc_5.3.bbappend" file to containing the additions that you
did to poky on...
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=1c0fc7fcf7772ef8774f623126050972f526fe83
...as I think that adding these depend
i have used following steps to get and build the BSP for soloX sabre board.
i am using Krogoth branch to build the bsp and populate sdk
https://github.com/Freescale/fsl-community-bsp-platform
then i added qt support in the build by following
http://wiki.wandboard.org/index.php/Build
On 08/12/16 13:54, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> +WKS_FILE
> +
> + WKS_FILE[doc] = "Specifies the name of the wic kickstart
> file."
> +
> +
> +
> +Specifies the the of the wic kickstart file that is
'the the'?
-
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:00:19 +0100
Mirza Krak wrote:
> From: Mirza Krak
>
> U-boot has been updated to 2016.11 in OE-core Which means that we can
> use the upstream patches instead of the backports and no need for the third
> patch which causes a build error when used with 2016.11.
>
> Signed-
20 matches
Mail list logo
