[yocto] FW: QA cycle report for 2.4 RC1

2017-10-06 Thread Cruz, Libertad
Hello All, Enjoy viewing the full Report for 2.4 RC1: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW40_-_2017-10-06_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.4_RC1 === Summary The QA cycle for release 2.4 RC1 is complete. There are 18 new bugs from which 5 are high priority and are targeted to be fixed in

Re: [yocto] Framework to implement mirroring in Yocto

2017-10-06 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Gutierrez, Hernan Ildefonso (Boise R&D, FW) wrote: > Hi, > > We are planning to implement a mirror for both source code downloaded and > sscache in our work environment. > > We are planning to use Nexus and Nuget to allow storage and versioning > control. We don’t k

[yocto] Framework to implement mirroring in Yocto

2017-10-06 Thread Gutierrez, Hernan Ildefonso (Boise R&D, FW)
Hi, We are planning to implement a mirror for both source code downloaded and sscache in our work environment. We are planning to use Nexus and Nuget to allow storage and versioning control. We don't know if these are the right tools. Since we are about to embark in this project, before starti

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [opkg-utils PATCH] opkg.py/opkg-make-index: Add option to include all fields

2017-10-06 Thread Alejandro del Castillo
yep, that makes sense, thanks for the contribution merged On 10/05/2017 12:03 PM, Jeffrey Pautler wrote: If the -f option is enabled, opkg-make-index will include user-defined fields in the package index rather than discarding them. This change is motivated by the fact that opkg now has suppo

Re: [yocto] Boost + Yocto

2017-10-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Patrick Vacek wrote: > On 06.10.2017 15:36, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Patrick Vacek >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm trying to understand how Yocto figures out which Boost libraries to >>> install in an image. I've been studying the Boost r

Re: [yocto] [opkg-devel] [opkg-utils PATCH] opkg.py: Remove reformatting of description field

2017-10-06 Thread Alejandro del Castillo
Agreed, opkg-make-index spould not be formatting control files. Description should be treated as any other field. merged On 10/05/2017 09:05 AM, Jeffrey Pautler wrote: The Debian Policy Manual describes the format of the description field. This includes information about how lines might be wr

Re: [yocto] read-only-rootfs causes systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service failure ( symlink(../run/lock, /var/lock) failed: Read-only file system)

2017-10-06 Thread Ayoub Zaki
Hi, On 06.10.2017 15:40, richard_al...@keysight.com wrote: I am build an image with read-only-rootfs When enabled, during startup I get a [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories. See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details. ● systemd-tmpfiles-set

[yocto] read-only-rootfs causes systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service failure ( symlink(../run/lock, /var/lock) failed: Read-only file system)

2017-10-06 Thread richard_allen
I am build an image with read-only-rootfs When enabled, during startup I get a [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories. See 'systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service' for details. ● systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service - Create Volatile Files and Directories Loaded:

Re: [yocto] Boost + Yocto

2017-10-06 Thread Patrick Vacek
On 06.10.2017 15:36, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Patrick Vacek > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to understand how Yocto figures out which Boost libraries to >> install in an image. I've been studying the Boost recipes and it looks >> like RRECOMMENDS is used to specify all

Re: [yocto] Bitbaking a recipe often triggers a do_package_write_rpm of a dependant recipe... why?

2017-10-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Torsten Sievers wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the situation: > > I have two custom made recipes, one is a SDK , the other one is a set of > examples that use the sdk. > > The examples recipe has DEPENDS and RDEPENDS set that point to artifacts > that are produced by

Re: [yocto] Boost + Yocto

2017-10-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Patrick Vacek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to understand how Yocto figures out which Boost libraries to > install in an image. I've been studying the Boost recipes and it looks > like RRECOMMENDS is used to specify all of the libraries, but yet my > image only get

Re: [yocto] Adding support for yum in a yocto image

2017-10-06 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 10/05/2017 10:08 PM, Josef Holzmayr wrote: Uhm. Be aware that your custom built distribution is *not* some kind of Fedora-Light. Its an entirely different distribution, and mixing in repositories from somewhere is most certainly disastrous - or do you think using that OpenSuse repo plays a

[yocto] email

2017-10-06 Thread siva
siv...@easyarm.com -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] Boost + Yocto

2017-10-06 Thread Patrick Vacek
Hello, I'm trying to understand how Yocto figures out which Boost libraries to install in an image. I've been studying the Boost recipes and it looks like RRECOMMENDS is used to specify all of the libraries, but yet my image only gets a subset of them. It's the subset that I typically need, so it'

Re: [yocto] Kernel driver installs broken in poky2.3

2017-10-06 Thread Valluri, Amarnath
Hi Jeff, Sorry to hear about the failure, The change was part of adding merged /usr support for oecore. 'INSTALL_MOD_PATH' was using '/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}' as kernel modules path, where as in merged /usr environments it would be '/usr/lib/modules/${KERNEL_VERSION}'., And there is no