Re: [yocto] why does yocto dev manual emphasize meta-intel BSP layer so much?

to_Project [2] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/LayerIndex [3] http://www.yoctoproject.org/download -Tyler Jones ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] is there a summary of the proper use of all yocto-related mailing lists?

their description, but I feel they do not belong on the Yocto Project's site. -Tyler Jones On 19 June 2012 01:44, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > OE ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] is there a summary of the proper use of all yocto-related mailing lists?

yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto Check here: http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists I feel that this provides enough of a description of each mailing list. -Tyler Jones ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] Setting architecture of only DEB files (arm vs armel)

On 14 June 2012 23:18, Khem Raj wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 6/14/2012 5:17 PM, Tyler Jones wrote: > > I am compiling a distro for my hardware using DEBs for my package > > management. In meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass I need DPKG_AR

[yocto] Setting architecture of only DEB files (arm vs armel)

CH to be set to "arm". Is there a non hackish way to do this from my BSP layer or config file? The dpkg error I get is: package architecture (arm) does not match system (armel) -Tyler Jones ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://l