Hi Paul,
sorry for late answer - I read only now you are talking about FIT.
On 09/05/2014 16:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> My first question is, is there a better place to be making the FIT image?
>>
>
> It depends on if everything you need to construct the FIT image is
> in the kernel
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 23:31 +, Paul McGougan wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Nyström [mailto:david.c.nyst...@gmail.com]
>
> > To me, Thats sound like a bug in the dependency parser.
> > It should not parse for changes in comments, i.e. in this case
> > do_install_append
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nyström [mailto:david.c.nyst...@gmail.com]
> To me, Thats sound like a bug in the dependency parser.
> It should not parse for changes in comments, i.e. in this case
> do_install_append
> comments.
>
> Or perhaps in variable expansion, which could be a
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
> Er, if DATETIME is in the dependencies for this task and that is a bug in the
> core
> recipe, we should fix it in the core. The question is how is it getting in
> there?
>
The DATETIME was being intro
On 2014-05-12 07:56, Paul McGougan wrote:
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the
do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I
try to bitbake anything that depends on the kerne
On Monday 12 May 2014 07:03:55 Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 14-05-12 01:56 AM, Paul McGougan wrote:
> > From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
> >
> >>> Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the
> >>> do_install_append function, even if it is complete
On 14-05-12 01:56 AM, Paul McGougan wrote:
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the
do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I
try to bitbake anything that depends on the kernel,
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
> > Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the
> > do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I
> > try to bitbake anything that depends on the kernel, that bitbake always
> > re-r
On 14-05-09 01:14 AM, Paul McGougan wrote:
Hi all.
We are currently using Poky 1.5.0.
We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board.
We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT
(FDT) style kernel/dtb image blob.
To that end, in our custom layer we
Hi all.
We are currently using Poky 1.5.0.
We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board.
We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT (FDT) style
kernel/dtb image blob.
To that end, in our custom layer we have a file
poky/meta-OURS/recipes-kernel/lin
10 matches
Mail list logo