Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-19 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Paul, sorry for late answer - I read only now you are talking about FIT. On 09/05/2014 16:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> >> >> My first question is, is there a better place to be making the FIT image? >> > > It depends on if everything you need to construct the FIT image is > in the kernel

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 23:31 +, Paul McGougan wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: David Nyström [mailto:david.c.nyst...@gmail.com] > > > To me, Thats sound like a bug in the dependency parser. > > It should not parse for changes in comments, i.e. in this case > > do_install_append

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-12 Thread Paul McGougan
> -Original Message- > From: David Nyström [mailto:david.c.nyst...@gmail.com] > To me, Thats sound like a bug in the dependency parser. > It should not parse for changes in comments, i.e. in this case > do_install_append > comments. > > Or perhaps in variable expansion, which could be a

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-12 Thread Paul McGougan
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com] > Er, if DATETIME is in the dependencies for this task and that is a bug in the > core > recipe, we should fix it in the core. The question is how is it getting in > there? > The DATETIME was being intro

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-12 Thread David Nyström
On 2014-05-12 07:56, Paul McGougan wrote: From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I try to bitbake anything that depends on the kerne

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-12 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 12 May 2014 07:03:55 Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 14-05-12 01:56 AM, Paul McGougan wrote: > > From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] > > > >>> Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the > >>> do_install_append function, even if it is complete

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-12 01:56 AM, Paul McGougan wrote: From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I try to bitbake anything that depends on the kernel,

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-11 Thread Paul McGougan
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]   > > Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the > > do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I > > try to bitbake anything that depends on the kernel, that bitbake always > > re-r

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 01:14 AM, Paul McGougan wrote: Hi all. We are currently using Poky 1.5.0. We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board. We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT (FDT) style kernel/dtb image blob. To that end, in our custom layer we

[yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-08 Thread Paul McGougan
Hi all. We are currently using Poky 1.5.0. We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board. We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT (FDT) style kernel/dtb image blob. To that end, in our custom layer we have a file poky/meta-OURS/recipes-kernel/lin