On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Randy Witt
wrote:
> It is a bit of a different workflow than we were initially looking at, but I
> don't see a reason we couldn't do it. The locked signatures file should be
> able to be a superset of items you would want, so theoretically if you only
> wanted item
On 05/26/2015 03:38 PM, Ash Charles wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Randy Witt
wrote:
Did you source the environment-setup script? If so, what distro were you
using?
Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid-Vervet). I used an SDK created based on the
gumstix-console-image rather than a mainstream image fr
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Randy Witt
wrote:
> Did you source the environment-setup script? If so, what distro were you
> using?
Ubuntu 15.04 (Vivid-Vervet). I used an SDK created based on the
gumstix-console-image rather than a mainstream image from meta-yocto
so perhaps there is a particu
On 05/22/2015 03:24 PM, Ash Charles wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:13 PM, wrote:
The idea is that an sdk will comprise of a manifest(contains list of
sstate items in the sdk) and some location that contains the items in the
manifest. So to update the sdk you would run a command and give it
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:13 PM, wrote:
> The idea is that an sdk will comprise of a manifest(contains list of
> sstate items in the sdk) and some location that contains the items in the
> manifest. So to update the sdk you would run a command and give it the
> location of the manifest and sstat
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:54 PM, ChenQi wrote:
>> The rpm database is not usable. You do a query to list files that a
>> package
>> installed and you will find all the paths are not correct.
> Ah okay---that makes sense. Thanks.
>>
>> We are now working a new kind of SDK in OE. We call it exten
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:54 PM, ChenQi wrote:
> The rpm database is not usable. You do a query to list files that a package
> installed and you will find all the paths are not correct.
Ah okay---that makes sense. Thanks.
>
> We are now working a new kind of SDK in OE. We call it extensible SDK.
On 05/15/2015 02:21 AM, Ash Charles wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:26 PM, ChenQi wrote:
For the nativesdk part, we can use smart/rpm to manage packages. A long time
ago, I tried this out and succeeded.
However, for the target part, we cannot do the same thing as the rpm
database for the targe
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:26 PM, ChenQi wrote:
> For the nativesdk part, we can use smart/rpm to manage packages. A long time
> ago, I tried this out and succeeded.
> However, for the target part, we cannot do the same thing as the rpm
> database for the target part is not usable after installatio
Hi Ash,
SDK has basically two parts, nativesdk part and the target part.
For the nativesdk part, we can use smart/rpm to manage packages. A long
time ago, I tried this out and succeeded.
However, for the target part, we cannot do the same thing as the rpm
database for the target part is not usa
Hi,
I'd like to be able install packages using smart within an SDK
environment (much like [1]; @Erik, did you find a solution?).
I stumbled on two questions in looking into this.
1. Why does the nativesdk version of smart get wrapped with these
environment variables, 'RPM_USRLIBRPM', 'RPM_ETCRPM
11 matches
Mail list logo
