Re: [yocto] i think the list of "required software" needs to be clarified

2013-04-09 Thread Rudolf Streif
In a sense yes. From how I understand it, anything that is listed as a required utility in SANITY_REQUIRED_UTILITIES does not even have to be listed in ASSUME_PROVIDED. The required native utilites should fail the sanity test right away if they are not there. For any dependency listed in ASSUME_PR

Re: [yocto] i think the list of "required software" needs to be clarified

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i just found an old thread that i was in: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-July/025402.html i do notice what seems to be an inconsistency. from bitbake.conf: ASSUME_PROVIDED = "\ bzip2-native \ chrpath-native \ git-native \ grep-native \ diffsta

[yocto] i think the list of "required software" needs to be clarified

2013-04-09 Thread Robert P. J. Day
i know i've mentioned this before, but it's still somewhat confusing if a new yocto user wants to figure out *exactly* what he or she must install manually on a yocto development host. there are a pile of web pages that claim to explain this: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/yocto-pro