about, etc.
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Rifenbark, Scott M
>Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 9:48 AM
>To: Robert P. J. Day
>Cc: Yocto discussion list
>Subject: Re: [yocto] in kernel manual,
mapping
to the same KMACHINE value?
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:rpj...@crashcourse.ca]
>Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 9:15 AM
>To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Cc: Nathan Rossi; Yocto discussion list
>Subject: RE: [yocto] in kernel manual, should pi
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> I like Nathan's suggestion for the text. Can someone explain to me
> though why emenlow is not a good example here? In the
> linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend file, KMACHINE_emenlow-noemgd is set equal
> to "emenlow". Isn't this equating emenlow-noemgd an
the docs.
Bruce
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Rossi
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 5:48 AM
To: Robert P. J. Day
Cc: Yocto discussion list
Subject: Re: [yocto] in kernel manual, should
o discussion list
>Subject: Re: [yocto] in kernel manual, should pick another example for
>KMACHINE
>
>On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day
>wrote:
>>
>> in section 3.2 of the kernel dev manual, there is a discussion of
>> KMACHINE and how it is *ty
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> in section 3.2 of the kernel dev manual, there is a discussion of
> KMACHINE and how it is *typically* set to the same value as MACHINE,
> but there are cases where that might not be true; however, the example
> used to demonstrate thi
in section 3.2 of the kernel dev manual, there is a discussion of
KMACHINE and how it is *typically* set to the same value as MACHINE,
but there are cases where that might not be true; however, the example
used to demonstrate this -- emenlow and emenlow-noemgd -- doesn't seem
appropriate as ther
