On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 17:19, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 13-06-24 11:59 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi. We are using a 3.6 based kernel in our builds using a custom
>>> kernel recipe. However, I can see that the linux-libc-headers built
>>> but
On 24 June 2013 17:19, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-06-24 11:59 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
>>
>> Hi. We are using a 3.6 based kernel in our builds using a custom
>> kernel recipe. However, I can see that the linux-libc-headers built
>> but based on a 3.8 kernel?
>> Is this really how it should be?
On 13-06-24 11:59 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. We are using a 3.6 based kernel in our builds using a custom
kernel recipe. However, I can see that the linux-libc-headers built
but based on a 3.8 kernel?
Is this really how it should be? Are we supposed to also make a custom
recipe for the linux-li
Hi. We are using a 3.6 based kernel in our builds using a custom
kernel recipe. However, I can see that the linux-libc-headers built
but based on a 3.8 kernel?
Is this really how it should be? Are we supposed to also make a custom
recipe for the linux-libc-headers? The image seems to be executing
f
