Re: [Yocto-bsp] [yocto] Timestamp error between zImage & uname-a [ Yocto-2.6.1 + Qemux86 ]

2019-05-13 Thread AshishKumar Mishra
Thanks Ralph for informative reply . Will check once again after deleting the file you suggested . Ashish On Mon, May 13, 2019, 7:05 PM Ralph Siemsen wrote: > Hi Ashish, > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 5:57 AM AshishKumar Mishra < > ashish.emailaddr...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [Yocto-bsp] Error of " fs.inotify.max_user_watches " while using bitbake [ Yocto-2.6.1 + Qemux86]

2019-05-13 Thread AshishKumar Mishra
tion. Like if at 512K if we get the error again , not sure if increasing the value is the only value. Thanks Ashish On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:47 PM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 15:38 +0530, AshishKumar Mishra wrote: > > Can

[Yocto-bsp] Error of " fs.inotify.max_user_watches " while using bitbake [ Yocto-2.6.1 + Qemux86]

2019-05-13 Thread AshishKumar Mishra
Hi Members , Can team members please let me know the solution & what is causing the below mentioned error ? ( I am having around 128GB of disk space still left , hence don't think that space is the issue here ) ~/Documents/linux-foundation-projects/yocto/poky/build (slef-bsp) : bitbake -vn virtua

Re: [Yocto-bsp] [yocto] Timestamp error between zImage & uname-a [ Yocto-2.6.1 + Qemux86 ]

2019-05-13 Thread AshishKumar Mishra
On 5/10/19 12:10 AM, AshishKumar Mishra wrote: > > HI Anuj , > > > > I was building minimal image using $ bitbake core-image-minimal haven't > > tried full-cmdline. > > > > Not able to track why kernel "uname" has older timestamp rather than &g

Re: [Yocto-bsp] [yocto] Timestamp error between zImage & uname-a [ Yocto-2.6.1 + Qemux86 ]

2019-05-10 Thread AshishKumar Mishra
HI Anuj , I was building minimal image using $ bitbake core-image-minimal haven't tried full-cmdline. Not able to track why kernel "uname" has older timestamp rather than the one from build/deploy/image as seen by "ls -al Am i missing any command or sequence here -- __