> > I just attended this HTC conference and had a chat with a guy from
> > UiO (university of oslo) about ZFS. He claimed Solaris/OI will die
> > silently if a single pool fails. I have seen similar earlier, then
> > due to a bug in ZFS (two drives lost in a RAIDz2, spares taking
> > over, resilver
> > The system became non-responsible after two drives was lost, and
> > replaced with spares, in that VDEV. That bug has been filed and
> > acknowleged. Take a RAIDz2 with two spares and remove a drive from
> > the pool, let it resilver to a spare, remove another, wait until it
> > resilvers again
On May 24, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Peter Jeremy
> wrote:
>> I believe the various OSS projects that use ZFS have formed a working
>> group to co-ordinate ZFS amongst themselves. I don't know if Oracle
>> was invited to join (though given the way O
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> I believe the various OSS projects that use ZFS have formed a working
> group to co-ordinate ZFS amongst themselves. I don't know if Oracle
> was invited to join (though given the way Oracle has behaved in all
Richard would probably know for
On 2011-May-25 03:49:43 +0800, Brandon High wrote:
>... unless Oracle's zpool v30 is different than Nexenta's v30.
This would be unfortunate but no worse than the current situation
with UFS - Solaris, *BSD and HP Tru64 all have native UFS filesystems,
all of which are incompatible.
I believe the
Sure enough Cindy, the eSATA cables had been crossed. I exported, powered off,
reversed the cables, booted, imported, and the pool is currently resilvering
with both c5t0d0 & c5t1d0 present in the mirror. :) Thank you!!
Alex
On May 24, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
Well
With various fock of opensource project
E.g. Zfs, opensolaris, openindina etc there are all different
There are not guarantee to be compatible
Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D
On May 24, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 05/25/11 07:49 AM, Brandon High wrote:
>> O
Hi Brandon,
Thanks for the details. Sounds to me like Nexenta is in the lead!
Kind regards,
Hans Rattink
2011/5/24 Richard Elling
> On May 24, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Brandon High wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Richard Elling
> > wrote:
> >> There are many ZFS implementations,
On 05/25/11 07:49 AM, Brandon High wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
There are many ZFS implementations, each evolving as the contributors desire.
Diversity and innovation is a good thing.
... unless Oracle's zpool v30 is different than Nexenta's v30.
That coul
On May 24, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Richard Elling
> wrote:
>> There are many ZFS implementations, each evolving as the contributors desire.
>> Diversity and innovation is a good thing.
>
> ... unless Oracle's zpool v30 is different than Nexenta'
Thanks all, this cleared up some grey details for me!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
> There are many ZFS implementations, each evolving as the contributors desire.
> Diversity and innovation is a good thing.
... unless Oracle's zpool v30 is different than Nexenta's v30.
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
_
On May 24, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Hans Rattink wrote:
> Hi Erik and Kebabber,
>
> Thanks for your answers. Do i summarize it right saying: the best conclusion
> would be then that Nexenta has it's own version of ZFS and has nothing to
> fear of Oracle other ZFS-developpers but that it's uncertain w
yes
IMHO, oracle and nexenta are target different customer
On 5/24/2011 3:30 PM, Hans Rattink wrote:
IMHO, oracle would prefer customer go with ZFS
appliance with added
WebGUI and all the extra support like Analytics,
L2ARc and ZIL with SSD etc
Last week i've seen mirrored ZIL upon ZEUS SSD i
> IMHO, oracle would prefer customer go with ZFS
> appliance with added
> WebGUI and all the extra support like Analytics,
> L2ARc and ZIL with SSD etc
Last week i've seen mirrored ZIL upon ZEUS SSD in a Boston NexentaStor solution.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> > Shouldn't ZFS detach these automatically? It has done so earlier...
> It is not supposed to- at least that I recall.
Earlier replaces have gone well. One thing is spares, which I can understand
somewhat, but dead drives should definetely be tossed off when replaced
Vennlige hilsener / Best r
man zpool /failmode
-Albert
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just attended this HTC conference and had a chat with a guy from UiO
> (university of oslo) about ZFS. He claimed Solaris/OI will die silently if a
> single pool fails. I have seen similar
IMHO, oracle would prefer customer go with ZFS appliance with added
WebGUI and all the extra support like Analytics, L2ARc and ZIL with SSD etc
On 5/24/2011 2:30 PM, Hans Rattink wrote:
Hi Erik and Kebabber,
Thanks for your answers. Do i summarize it right saying: the best conclusion
would
Hi Erik and Kebabber,
Thanks for your answers. Do i summarize it right saying: the best conclusion
would be then that Nexenta has it's own version of ZFS and has nothing to fear
of Oracle other ZFS-developpers but that it's uncertain what NetApp might come
up with as the details aren't publishe
Hi all
I just attended this HTC conference and had a chat with a guy from UiO
(university of oslo) about ZFS. He claimed Solaris/OI will die silently if a
single pool fails. I have seen similar earlier, then due to a bug in ZFS (two
drives lost in a RAIDz2, spares taking over, resilvering and t
On 5/24/2011 8:28 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
The netapp lawsuit is solved. No conflicts there.
Regarding ZFS, it is open under CDDL license. The leaked source code that is
already open is open. Nexenta is using the open sourced version of ZFS. Oracle
might close future ZFS versions, but Nexenta's
Hi Alex,
If the hardware and cables were moved around then this is probably
the root cause of your problem. You should see if you can move the
devices/cabling back to what they were before the move.
The zpool history output provides the original device name, which
isn't c5t1d0, either:
# zpool
> Two drives have been resilvered, but the old drives still stick. The drive
> that has died still hasn't been taken over by a spare, although the two
> spares show up as AVAIL.
For the one that hasn't been replaced try doing:
zpool replace dbpool c8t24d0 c4t43d0
For the two that have already be
I have a more generall question about intellectual rights around ZFS, when
taking a look at the storage solution NexentaStor.
Perhaps not necessary to mention, but to be complete: NexentaStor has created a
Open Source SAN solution that runs on commodity hardware. Compellent for
example has a NA
The netapp lawsuit is solved. No conflicts there.
Regarding ZFS, it is open under CDDL license. The leaked source code that is
already open is open. Nexenta is using the open sourced version of ZFS. Oracle
might close future ZFS versions, but Nexenta's ZFS is open and can not be
closed.
--
Thi
On 5/24/2011 9:37 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When I search around, I see that nexenta has ndmp, and solaris 10 does
not, and there was at least some talk about supporting ndmp in
opensolaris ... So ...
Is ndmp present in solaris 11 express? Is it an installable 3rd party
package? How
On 05/24/11 14:37, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When I search around, I see that nexenta has ndmp, and solaris 10 does
not, and there was at least some talk about supporting ndmp in
opensolaris ... So ...
Is ndmp present in solaris 11 express? Is it an installable 3rd party
package? How would you go
When I search around, I see that nexenta has ndmp, and solaris 10 does not,
and there was at least some talk about supporting ndmp in opensolaris ...
So ...
Is ndmp present in solaris 11 express? Is it an installable 3rd party
package? How would you go about supporting ndmp if you wanted to?
On 05/24/2011 03:08 PM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> see the seeksize script on this URL:
>
> http://prefetch.net/articles/solaris.dtracetopten.html
>
> Not used it but looks neat!
>
> cheers Andy.
I already did and it does the job just fine. Thank you for your kind
suggestion.
BR,
-
Hi,
see the seeksize script on this URL:
http://prefetch.net/articles/solaris.dtracetopten.html
Not used it but looks neat!
cheers Andy.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-di
Hi all
I have a rather large pool that has been a bit troublesome. We've lost some
drives (WD Black), and though that should work out well, I now have a pool that
doesn't look too healthy.
http://paste.ubuntu.com/611973/
Two drives have been resilvered, but the old drives still stick. The driv
31 matches
Mail list logo
