Re: [zfs-discuss] snaps lost in space?

2010-12-10 Thread Joost Mulders
elow (6792701) is not related to this phenomenon, > it manifests as a discrepancy between the filesystem's (or a > snapshot's) "referenced" space and the amount of space accessible > through posix interfaces (eg, du(1)). > > --matt > > On Mon, Dec 6, 20

Re: [zfs-discuss] snaps lost in space?

2010-12-07 Thread Joost Mulders
nd/receive is a method to remove them. Best regards, Joost On 6-12-2010 13:09, Joost Mulders wrote: Hi, I've output of space allocation which I can't explain. I hope someone can point me at the right direction. The allocation of my "home" filesystem looks like this: jo...@o

Re: [zfs-discuss] snaps lost in space?

2010-12-06 Thread Joost Mulders
finished I noticed that p1 used 87.6G less space than p0. The origin of this allocation seems to be in the home filesystem but I can't find any reference to it. Any pointers appreciated! Joost On 6-12-2010 17:54, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mai

[zfs-discuss] snaps lost in space?

2010-12-06 Thread Joost Mulders
Hi, I've output of space allocation which I can't explain. I hope someone can point me at the right direction. The allocation of my "home" filesystem looks like this: jo...@onix$ zfs list -o space p0/home NAME AVAIL USED USEDSNAP USEDDS USEDREFRESERV USEDCHILD p0/home 31.0G 156G