On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Cuyler Dingwell wrote:
> In the process of replacing a raidz1 of four 500GB drives with four
> 1.5TB drives on the third one I ran into an interesting issue. The
> process was to remove the old drive, put the new drive in and let it
> rebuild.
>
> The problem was the third
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Scott L. Burson wrote:
> This is in snv_86. I have a four-drive raidz pool. One of the drives
> died. I replaced it, but wasn't careful to put the new drive on the
> same controller port; one of the existing drives wound up on the port
> that had previously been used by
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Matt Harrison wrote:
>>
>> Is this guy seriously for real? It's getting hard to stay on the list
>> with all this going on. No list etiquette, complete irrelevant
>> ramblings, need I go on?
>
> The ZFS discussion list has produced
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonny Gerold wrote:
> Hello,
> I was hoping that this would work:
> http://blogs.sun.com/zhangfan/entry/how_to_turn_a_mirror
>
> I have 4x(1TB) disks, one of which is filled with 800GB of data (that I
> cant delete/backup somewhere else)
>
>> r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool create -f
